The government on Wednesday inaugurated the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), a ministry-level Cabinet council, making it a top government agency in guiding the nation’s development in science and technology. The council is intended to play an essential role in Taiwan’s industrial transformation and technological innovations. Its establishment means the reorganization of the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), which was set up in March 2014, with former minister of science and technology Wu Tsung-tsong (吳政忠) heading the new agency.
It also signals the organizational evolution of a policymaking bureaucracy for science and technology development dating back to 1959, when the Guidelines for the Long-term Development of Science (國家長期發展科學計畫綱領) were passed to improve the basic sciences and lay the groundwork for a solid research environment. That same year, the government established the National Long-Term Science Development Committee to oversee research organization planning and tertiary education. It was renamed the National Science Council (NSC) in 1969, before being restructured into the MOST in 2014.
Over the past seven decades, the government agency responsible for promoting science and technology development has undergone several changes in terms of organizational structure and function to align with the nation’s development needs at a given time. For example, the NSC was tasked with promoting basic research and supporting academic research, as well as formulating policies and developing science parks. In 2014, it was transformed into the MOST to connect academic research and industrial development.
Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the Ministry of Economic Affairs has also made significant contributions over the years, helping to improve the applied research and technological capabilities of local industries, while the Cabinet-level National Development Council has of late become a major force supporting the development of local technology start-ups in Taiwan. Unfortunately, to meet their goals and vie for government resources, competition between the agencies has for years fomented tensions among them.
Due to the growing importance of science and technology development to the nation’s economic growth, government agencies need greater cross-departmental and inter-ministerial cooperation, and the appointment of Wu, a minister without portfolio, as NSTC head indicates the government’s desire to have him coordinate resource allocation across ministries and implement major science and technology policies.
Speaking at the inaugural ceremony, Wu said the new council would draft science and technology policies, support basic research, improve science parks, promote sustainable development and cultivate talent. He also said that precision healthcare, smart medicare, electric vehicles and the space industry are among the key sectors the government aims to focus on. However, for Wu to succeed in his job, the NSTC needs to integrate functions that were previously in the domain of other agencies. In addition to its role in policy formulation, the new council must also coordinate, evaluate and supervise the execution of plans initiated by other agencies. In a nutshell, this is about efficiency and bureaucratic flexibility.
The council should avoid making the same mistake its predecessor did over the past eight years: keeping the ratio of basic research spending to overall technological research and development spending below 10 percent. The nation’s long-term competitiveness could be undermined by a weak commitment to basic research. Funding for basic research in other major economies generally accounts for 10 percent or more of their national research and development budgets to ensure sustained research in science and technology.
Continuing to lag far behind other advanced countries in this regard would only make Taiwan’s goal of becoming a scientific and technological innovation power more far-fetched.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS