In the ninth century, an Ethiopian herder named Kaldi noticed something odd. Whenever his goats ate the berries of a particular tree, they seemed to get a jolt of energy. His curiosity piqued, Kaldi took some of the berries to a monastery, where the abbot took a taste and, shocked by their bitterness, tossed the berries into the fire. To both of their surprise, however, a tantalizing aroma soon wafted in their direction. They removed the now-roasted berries from the fire, soaked them in water and took the first-ever sip of coffee.
It is fitting that African countries today command a significant share of a global industry that has since become an integral part of billions of people’s lives. Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda all rank among the world’s top 25 coffee producers, while several other countries — including Angola, Ghana, Liberia, Burundi, Zambia, Sao Tome and Principe, and Sierra Leone — are increasing their market share.
Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that African coffee farmers will reap their fair share of benefits from these efforts.
Globally, coffee exports will be worth an estimated US$155 billion by 2026. Although coffee is becoming the drink of choice around Africa, thanks to the rapid growth of the continent’s middle class, whether African farmers, of coffee or other crops, can take advantage of such opportunities depends significantly on the trajectory of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
Once fully implemented, the AfCFTA will be the world’s largest free-trade area, connecting 1.3 billion consumers across 54 countries in a single market for goods and services. The UN’s Conference on Trade and Development estimates that the AfCFTA could boost intra-African trade — which is currently low, with only 14.4 percent of all African exports remaining on the continent — by about 33 percent. It could also reduce the continent’s trade deficit with the rest of the world by 51 percent.
The problem is that few farmers know what the AfCFTA is, let alone how it can help them. According to a report by the not-for-profit organization Africa No Filter, awareness of the AfCFTA among micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in Nigeria was as low as 3 percent in the agricultural sector in 2020.
In East Africa, the continent’s biggest coffee-producing region, only 14 percent of the private business sector was aware of the AfCFTA. It is therefore likely that most African coffee farmers — roughly 80 percent of whom are smallholders — do not know that the AfCFTA Secretariat has signed a memorandum of understanding with the Inter-African Coffee Organization to support the development of the continent’s coffee value chain.
This is partly a matter of media coverage. As the Africa No Filter report points out, the AfCFTA features in less than 1 percent of business news about the continent.
Last year, when the AfCFTA Secretariat and the UN Development Programme released a report identifying value chains on which investment should focus — from the automotive sector to cocoa to lithium-ion batteries — the media barely covered it.
If a large share of consumers, entrepreneurs and businesses are unable to keep up with developments relating to the AfCFTA or participate in discussions about how it should develop, the agreement will start to look like yet another initiative that helps only the privileged few. This could end up becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy, as insufficient information and awareness prevent the majority from taking advantage of the opportunities it creates.
Given the AfCFTA’s critical importance to Africa’s economic future, that would be a major loss. To avoid this outcome, governments must use the help of media to return to two of its most essential functions: to inform and engage.
To meet the first imperative, governments should work with the AfCFTA Secretariat and other partners to revive the kinds of “awareness workshops” that were introduced when the COVID-19 pandemic began.
The goal must be to reach all stakeholders, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, with comprehensive information about the AfCFTA, using plain and accessible language to clarify the ways in which cross-border trade is being simplified. The secretariat should also ensure that all relevant information is available on accessible online platforms.
The point is not to deliver abstract facts. People tend to engage with issues only when their livelihoods are affected, so it is vital to show exactly what the AfCFTA means for businesses and consumers in practice. For example, a coffee farmer in Harar, Ethiopia, must understand both that they have a potential market in Botswana, with its developing coffee culture and large middle class, and how the AfCFTA can help them access it.
Climate change poses serious risks to the AfCFTA, as most African economies’ dependence on minerals, agriculture and wildlife leaves them vulnerable to extreme weather. According to the UN, if global warming reaches 1 to 4°C, the continent’s overall GDP is expected to decrease by 2.25 to 12.12 percent, with west, central and east Africa expected to bear the brunt of this decline.
Therefore, it is imperative to use trade as a lever for sustainable growth. Implementation of the AfCFTA must also align with Agenda 2063, the African Union’s strategic framework, which seeks inclusive growth and sustainable development for the continent, and emphasizes the importance of building “environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient economies and communities.”
To ensure that the impact of the agreement is as powerful as possible, governments should implement national-level measures and strategies to complement the AfCFTA.
At the same time, African Union institutions should work with organizations like the African Development Bank, the African Export-Import Bank and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development to improve coordination on transboundary projects affecting intra-African trade, such as infrastructure investments.
---The African Union itself should also be reformed, in line with recommendations made in 2017 by Rwandan President Paul Kagame.
More fundamentally, African governments, societies and institutions must embrace the principle that African countries share a common history and a common destiny. This will go a long way toward accelerating the AfCFTA’s implementation and maximizing its benefits.
The AfCFTA Secretariat’s secretary-general Wamkele Mene has made clear that, thanks to the agreement, Africa is “open for business.”
That is true, but it will mean little unless the people running those businesses — from smallholder farmers to innovative entrepreneurs, from Cape Town to Cairo — are aware of it and reaping the benefits.
Bogolo J. Kenewendo, a former Botswanan minister of investment, trade and industry, is a non-resident fellow at the US Center for Global Development, managing director of Kenewendo Advisory and Africa director for the UN High-Level Climate Champions.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS