Friday last week marked the 35th anniversary of the lifting of martial law. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) posted on Facebook to mark the event, but also used the occasion to attack the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its “authoritarian and despotic ways.”
Interestingly, it was former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP who designated July 15 as a historic day to commemorate the end of the Martial Law era, and if one looks at how the KMT has been obstructing transitional justice, it is evident which one has been the more “authoritarian” party.
As the party that imposed martial law in the first place, it is understandable that the KMT has always evaded the topic. Nevertheless, to support Chu’s Facebook post, the party posted on its Facebook fan page an explanation for imposing martial law in 1949, with many Internet users commenting on the three main points of its post: context, historical legacy and the party’s promise to take responsibility. As for how the KMT has taken responsibility, it has, unsurprisingly, left that part open.
An interesting question is whether the lifting of martial law really meant the end of it. Even though it ended on July 15, 1987, its specter has continued to haunt Taiwan, as numerous legal restrictions had been introduced to the judicial and administrative system under the authoritarian regime. Aside from censorship, several forms of control and restraint have been written into laws and regulations as well.
Files declassified by the Transitional Justice Commission show that the KMT’s authoritarian monitoring and measures only ended in 2000, 13 years after the lifting of martial law, when Taiwan underwent its first transfer of political power to another party.
The repeal of the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) and an amendment to Article 100 of the Criminal Code have done nothing to mitigate the harm that authoritarianism has inflicted on Taiwanese society. As there were countless related restrictions, transitional justice has been a slow and arduous process.
For example, on July 14, 1993 — six years after the lifting of martial law — the legislature finally repealed language restrictions stipulated in the Enforcement Rules of the Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法施行細則). Before that, the KMT’s policy to abolish native languages besides Mandarin had left generations of Taiwanese with memories of having to pay fines or stand outside classrooms for speaking their native languages when they were young. The repercussion of this policy was the near extinction of native languages such as Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), Hakka and indigenous languages.
In the past few years, the government has added Southeast Asian languages and indigenous languages to the curriculum to promote their development.
However, the policy has been heavily censured by the KMT, saying that learning those native languages should be confined to the home or time after school. This blatant move to exclude native languages other than Mandarin shows that the KMT has not changed its authoritarian nature, so how could it convince the public that it can “take responsibility”?
For a party that has never taken a pro-Taiwan stance, it has no right to talk about the anniversary. If the KMT wishes to make amends for its past wrongdoing, it would have to start with offering a sincere apology.
Chen Kuan-fu is a graduate law student at National Taipei University.
Translated by Rita Wang
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS