As income growth continues to lag behind rising housing prices, an increasing number of people are pushing back the age at which they purchase their first home. That is because they must spend more time to earn enough money for a down payment. The average age for first-time home buyers was 30 to 35 in the first quarter of 2013, but for the same period this year it ranged from 35 to 40, Evertrust Rehouse said last week, citing data compiled by the Joint Credit Information Center.
The brokerage also said that the average price of a home purchased by people aged 35 to 40 in the first quarter of this year was NT$11.54 million (US$385,360), NT$4.13 million more than the NT$7.41 million that the same age group spent nine years earlier. However, the floor area of properties purchased by this age group had shrunk by 2.1 ping (6.94m2) to 43.6 ping on average this year, from 45.7 ping in 2013.
In addition, 22 percent of people taking out a mortgage in the first quarter of 2013 were aged 30 to 35, but in the first quarter of this year, primary mortgage takers were aged 35 to 40, accounting for 19 percent of the total, and those aged 50 and older, or 20 percent, the brokerage said, citing the center’s data.
People aged 50 and older have become the primary demographic taking new mortgages, the analysis shows. This phenomenon reflects that people aged 50 and older have sufficient wealth for property purchases, want to purchase properties given that homes are tangible assets that retain value amid global economic changes or choose to transfer some assets to real estate to hand down to their children.
Indeed, people aged 50 and older tend to have a stable income with a good credit record, so it is not unusual that they would become the main demographic taking out mortgages. However, an important takeaway from the data is that if real-estate prices continue to climb faster than wage growth, young adults would face more difficulty buying homes before the age of 35, and the average age for mortgage holders would also likely continue to grow. People who cannot save for a down payment early in life are having greater trouble affording homes, but even when borrowing money to buy a home, rising prices mean heavier mortgage burdens and lower affordability.
Unaffordable housing in Taiwan has been a top public grievance for many years, and the ratio of housing prices to family incomes confirms the trend of deteriorating affordability. Based on data released by the Ministry of the Interior early this month, Taiwanese home prices averaged 9.58 times household income in the first quarter of the year, the highest since the ministry began collecting such data in 2002. Meanwhile, mortgages accounted for 38.35 percent of household income in the first three months this year, up 0.52 percentage points from the previous quarter and 1.81 percentage points from a year earlier, the data showed.
Difficulty in purchasing a home is a crucial factor that keeps people from marrying, and deters young couples from having children, which then affects consumption, investment and production. The government must fulfill its promises to make housing more affordable, or this issue could have a deleterious effect on the nation’s economy and society, to the extent that it evolves into a national security issue.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS