At the G7 summit in Germany late last month, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida criticized China for sending vessels near the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台, known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan). He took issue with Beijing for its exploration of gas fields in Japanese waters in the East China Sea, and for threatening the security of the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida also said that China should not be allowed to change the “status quo” by force, and specifically referred to the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. He called on G7 nations to strengthen security cooperation with Indo-Pacific nations.
After the G7 meeting, Kishida attended the NATO summit in Madrid. It was the first time Japan and South Korea were invited to the summit. Their attendance shows that the Europe and the US’ strategic center of gravity is shifting to the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida’s address at the summit expressed a thought of every attendee: “Ukraine today may be East Asia tomorrow.”
Although the war in Ukraine continues to rage, the real threat to world peace is not Russia, a declining power, but China, with its expansionist ambitions in the Indo-Pacific region.
Kishida stressed that Japan would bolster its defenses in the next five years, and pledged that his administration would significantly increase the national defense budget.
China immediately hit back by convening a discussion forum in Beijing and drawing upon former Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama, whose family has a history of close ties with China.
At the forum, the fourth-generation pro-China, anti-US propagandist — who holds the dubious record of being Japan’s shortest-serving prime minister, from Sept. 16, 2009, to June 8, 2010 — stated that China’s claims to the Senkaku Islands were reasonable, and lambasted Kishida’s views on China, which he said were “encouraging Taiwanese independence.”
Beijing’s reaction and use of Hatoyama as a spokesperson prove that Kishida’s intentions are correct. Much of Japan’s current strategic planning around national security and foreign diplomacy, including Kishida’s public remarks at the G7 and NATO summits, demonstrate substantial support for Taiwanese independence.
The rationale behind Japan’s positioning is clear: An independent, self-governing Taiwan is a vital impediment to China’s expansionist strategy.
Before Kishida assumed office, observers in Taiwan worried about his past inclinations toward the pro-China wing of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party, and wondered if he would he continue on the trajectory of the administration of former prime minster Shinzo Abe, which displayed its strong support for Taiwan.
Today we can say that those fears were unfounded, and this should not be surprising. After all, Japan’s long-term strategic interest does not alter with the whims of each prime minister. Although Kishida might have previously shown goodwill toward China, he is clearly deeply cognizant of the threat China poses to Japan’s security — and even to world peace.
Taiwan should respond to Kishida’s firm support for the nation by signaling that it looks forward to deepening bilateral relations as close allies.
Now in its second term, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration should cast off the confusing and perplexing name “Republic of China” and tell the world that this peaceful fortress within the Indo-Pacific region stands firmly in the camp of other liberal democracies, and resolutely resists annexation by the dictatorship in the People’s Republic of China.
Tommy Lin is director of Wu Fu Eye Clinic and president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS