As midnight struck on June 30, 1997, and Hong Kong transitioned from British to Chinese rule, pro-democracy then-Hong Kong lawmaker Lee Wing-tat (李永達) stood with colleagues on the balcony of the territory’s Legislative Council, holding a defiant protest.
Hong Kong is to mark the 25th anniversary of the handover tomorrow, and the halfway point of “one country, two systems” — the governance model agreed by the UK and China under which the territory would keep some autonomy and freedoms.
That model was set to last 50 years, but even in its first hours, battle lines that would define Hong Kong’s politics for the next two decades were drawn.
Furious at outgoing Hong Kong governor Chris Patten’s last-gasp attempts at democratization, China had announced that any legislator who had openly supported the measures would be thrown out.
So the minute the handover became effective, Lee and many of his colleagues became seatless, but remained within the legislature to protest their expulsion. Other opposition figures went to the handover ceremony to show goodwill, but returned to join the rally later.
“This is a moment when all Chinese people should feel proud,” then-Hong Kong lawmaker Martin Lee (李柱銘), founder of the territory’s Democratic Party, said in a speech at the time. “We hope Hong Kong and China can progress together.”
Lee Wing-tat had more mixed feelings.
“We were no longer that optimistic and I no longer believed we would have full-fledged democracy,” he told reporters.
Twenty-five years later, there are no opposition lawmakers left in the legislature at all.
Many have been arrested under a National Security Law Beijing imposed in 2020 or disqualified from standing for office under new “patriots-only” electoral rules. Others have fled — including Lee Wing-tat, who now lives in Britain.
Like many, Lee Wing-tat was hopeful in 1984, when the Sino-British Joint Declaration laid the path to ending more than 150 years of British colonial rule.
“One country, two systems” promised a high degree of autonomy, independent judicial power, and that the territory’s leader would be appointed by Beijing on the basis of local elections or consultations.
Then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) “said a lot about things like ‘Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong,’ which was rather compelling,” Lee Wing-tat said.
However China’s deadly 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, which saw Beijing send in tanks to crush a democracy movement, shattered his faith in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
In the years after the handover, mistrust between Beijing and Hong Kongers like Lee Wing-tat only escalated.
The pro-democracy camp saw the leadership in Beijing as ruthless authoritarians set on denying Hong Kongers their promised rights, while the CCP increasingly saw Hong Kongers’ demands as a challenge to China’s sovereignty.
There were successful mass protests in 2003 and 2012 that led to Hong Kong government reshuffles, but campaigns to let Hong Kongers pick their own leaders, including the 2014 “Umbrella movement,” came to nothing.
Tensions finally exploded in the huge, sometimes violent protests of 2019, to which China responded with a comprehensive crackdown that has transformed the once outspoken territory.
Critics, including Patten, accuse the CCP of betraying its promises to Hong Kong.
“China has ripped up the joint declaration, and is vengefully and comprehensively trying to remove the freedoms of Hong Kong because it regards them as a threat, not to the security of China, but to the ability of the Chinese Communist Party to hang on to power,” Patten said last week.
However, former Hong Kong chief executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) said the crackdown over the past three years was “not overkill.”
“You can’t say: ‘We want to have a high degree of autonomy and you stand aside’ — that will be de facto independence of Hong Kong,” he told reporters.
Leung, whose administration faced down the “Umbrella movement,” blamed years of social and political unrest on people being misled by political figures and misunderstanding Hong Kong’s mini constitution.
He also said that hostile “external forces” might have been involved, but declined to be specific.
Echoing Beijing, Leung described “one country, two systems” as a success and said the arrangement might continue beyond its 50-year term, calling July 1, 2047 “a nonevent.”
Many Hong Kongers remain unconvinced. Public confidence in “one country, two systems” hit a historic low in the middle of 2020, polls carried out by the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute showed.
Some, like Herman Yiu (姚鈞豪), a former member of Hong Kong’s Tai Po District Council who was born in the year of the handover, have lost all hope of ever being able to make change within the system.
“Being born in 1997 ... it felt like my fate was connected to Hong Kong’s fate,” Yiu said. “I wanted to participate to make Hong Kong better.”
As a fresh graduate, Yiu was part of a pro-democracy landslide at one-person-one-vote district council elections in 2019.
His career was short-lived, though — in June last year he became one of the many politicians disqualified from office.
“I think now the emphasis of one country, two systems is on ‘one country,’” Yiu said. “I feel helpless, for Hong Kong and myself.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under