China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, was launched on Friday. With a total displacement of more than 80,000 tonnes, the vessel is the largest of China’s three aircraft carriers.
According to reports, the Fujian is about 300m long and 78m across at its widest point. It is conventionally powered, with a maximum speed of about 30 knots (55.6kph) and can carry 60 aircraft — including about 40 fighter jets, helicopters and airborne early warning and control aircraft. The deck of the carrier is equipped with an electromagnetic catapult system, which can speed up the take-off and landing of fighter jets.
Once it enters service, China’s navy will outperform the navies of most other countries, but there is still a long way to go before Beijing becomes a naval superpower.
When analyzing a nation’s military power, operational experience must also be taken into account. It can be said that the aircraft carriers of the US Navy are still the world’s best, enjoying a glittering record since World War II and an enviable naval culture.
Although the increased displacement of the Fujian is a great improvement on China’s other two carriers, it still cannot compete with the uninterrupted global combat capability of the US’ nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, which have night combat experience unmatched by the Chinese navy.
From the perspective of regional and major-power relations, China is already a “revisionist” and rising power. For Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the launch of the Fujian creates a propaganda opportunity for him to consolidate his leadership. With the manipulation of nationalism, China’s military establishment is changing the global situation, especially regarding competition for maritime power, having developed itself as a substantial strategic threat to Taiwan, the region and even the US.
Therefore, it is imperative for Taiwan’s military to add large Aegis surface ships, expand its layered deterrence capabilities and purchase more powerful beyond-visual-range air-launched weapons.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
In 2010, while speaking to a Taiwanese group in California, I was asked during a question-and-answer session: “What do you think of Confucius Institutes?” Confucius Institutes had been gaining popularity at the time, but despite that, my answer was quick and to the point. “Beware of them, they are Trojan horses.” Few grasped the implications, yet now, more than a decade later, the US Government Accountability Office has finally woken up to the danger they pose. There are barely five institutes left where once there were more than 100. A few years later, in a different discussion with Pavel Suian, a former Romanian
Midnight on Monday marked the 27th anniversary of the handover of Hong Kong from British to Chinese sovereignty. Under the terms of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration, an international treaty lodged at the UN, China promised that Hong Kongers’ way of life would remain unchanged for 50 years and the territory would have “a high degree of autonomy” under the so-called “one country, two systems” framework. Beijing’s crushing of the 2019-2020 anti-extradition law protests and imposition of the National Security Law in 2020, overriding even the pretense that Hong Kong’s autonomy would be respected, is a profound reminder to Taiwanese —
Fear is a powerful emotion. Major media outlets play on fear to draw in viewers and hold their attention. Book publishers relish opportunities to release titles that grab attention. For example, I once was told — semi-jokingly — that if I wanted to sell a lot of copies of my books, I should put a mushroom cloud over a picture of Taipei on the book cover. I declined that advice. But in the process, I was reminded that fear sells. When fear intrudes on policymaking it can cloud sound judgments. There is a tension in government, though, because intelligence agencies are