The nation’s first case of a teenager dying from COVID-19 complications — a 15-year-old boy — was reported by the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) on Monday last week. The boy was diagnosed with COVID-19 on May 22, isolated at home for seven days until May 29, returned to school the next day, and fell unconscious on campus. He did not have vital signs when rushed to hospital, and it was determined that he died from myocarditis, acute pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock associated with COVID-19.
The boy’s family said they had no time to pay their final respects or bury him as they wished, as they were told by the hospital and funeral service provider that the body of a person with COVID-19 must be cremated within 24 hours of death.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), head of the CECC, said COVID-19 was listed as a Category 5 communicable disease on Jan. 15, 2020. The category does not stipulate that the bodies of those who die with such a disease must be cremated within 24 hours.
Chen said the protocol for handling the bodies of deceased persons with COVID-19 is to cremate or obtain approval for a deep burial as soon as possible. This came as a shock to many people, especially family members of deceased COVID-19 cases, and triggered an outcry from opposition parties, including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). They accused the CECC of not explaining the rules clearly to hospitals and mortuaries, and called for Chen to apologize and resign.
Several local government heads said their understanding was that the bodies of deceased COVID-19 cases were to be cremated within 24 hours, and this has been the norm for more than two years. The center should have provided clear guidelines much earlier, they said.
While the CECC has not set a time limit for cremation, a problem lies in the rule requiring the bodies of deceased COVID-19 cases to be hermetically sealed in two body bags that cannot be reopened, which makes it nearly impossible for family members to see their loved ones and pay their final respects.
COVID-19 restrictions have limited the religious or cultural end-of-life rituals carried out in many parts of the world, leading to thousands of people dying or grieving alone. Several countries have significantly rolled back restrictions now that the less-virulent Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 has become the most prevalent strain of COVID-19. Taiwan also moved toward a strategy of tolerating controlled spread of the virus.
The controversy regarding cremations of COVID-19 cases should prompt Taipei to further rethink its disease prevention policies with a focus on being more humane. Economic recovery should not be its sole concern. If a certain degree of infection risk is deemed tolerable for business activities to resume, and policies are continually revised as understanding of the disease evolves, the government should also discuss with experts whether protocols for handling bodies should be revised. Families need better support and care in this regard.
The CECC should clarify its rules on basic hygiene and infection risk management protocols that funerary services must follow when handling the bodies of people who died with COVID-19.
Local governments should also share the responsibility of developing guidelines, including whether visitation services can be allowed. Local mortuary service offices should be included in such decisions given their expertise in mortuary refrigeration and other issues related to safe handling of bodies.
The CECC needs to ensure that the terrible misfortune that occurred to the family of the 15-year-old is never repeated.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,