Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) on May 28 told a national cultural meeting that the government would not make Taiwan a “bilingual nation” that uses Chinese and English.
However, when asked by reporters after the event, the Ministry of Education said it would continue to implement a policy to gradually make Taiwan a bilingual nation. As there were no follow-up questions, there is confusion about who is in charge of the policy.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) have strongly pushed bilingualism.
In 2014, when Lai was Tainan mayor, he proposed a 10-year plan to make English Tainan’s second official language, hoping to make the city bilingual.
In 2017, Tsai set a goal to turn Taiwan into a bilingual nation by 2030 and last month pledged to “accelerate the push for the bilingual country policy” as she attended the opening ceremony of a training session for senior civil servants.
Under the government’s bilingual nation policy, the Legislative Yuan in 2018 passed the Development of National Languages Act (國家語言發展法) and the Executive Yuan approved up to NT$10 billion (US$338.68 million) in funding to promote the policy.
This shows that making Taiwan a bilingual nation by 2030 is not just a political slogan.
Many cities and counties have since the policy’s inception established experimental bilingual schools.
Taipei has established “English Villages” (英語情境中心) in all 12 districts and has increasingly recruited teachers who are native-English speakers.
As many as 120 public schools in the city are promoting bilingual education in the ongoing academic year.
The other five special municipalities — New Taipei City, Taoyuan, Taichung, Tainan and Kaohsiung — as well as some other cities and counties, have worked hard to push for bilingual education.
Not long ago, I led a group of educators to visit several schools offering bilingual education in Taoyuan. The schools’ commitment and positive results were admirable and brought high hopes, showing that Taiwan is gradually getting closer to its bilingual education goal.
Halfway there, the nation should not give up.
Ever since the government launched the bilingual nation policy, it has yielded positive results thanks to the hard work of many cities and counties nationwide.
Some schools have integrated bilingual education offerings into their strategy to recruit students. Taipei’s experimental bilingual schools always reach their full enrollment capacity. It is evident that Taiwanese parents welcome bilingual education.
Su’s surprise claim that Taiwan would not become a bilingual nation is not only confusing, but also perturbing.
As people say, “education is a century-long plan.” A major policy must be stable and must not be changed overnight.
Taiwanese need the government to clarify the direction of its bilingual nation policy as soon as possible. Otherwise, Su is embarrassing the Ministry of Education, and local governments, schools, teachers, parents and students are left wondering what happened.
Tsai Jr-keng is a retired elementary-school principal.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS