It has been more than a week since the May 15 terrorist incident at a Presbyterian church in southern California and Taiwanese Presbyterians who have been reading about the shooting are horrified by what has happened, even though they themselves were not there. Indeed, many Taiwanese, who are not used to this kind of thing, will be feeling traumatized.
Officials in California said the incident was motivated by a political hatred of Taiwan, but from the age and sociopsychological profile of the perpetrator, coupled with the international political and diplomatic situation, it is perhaps not so much an example of an internal Taiwanese “provincial complex” and more a sign of foreign aggression.
First, why attack a Taiwanese Presbyterian church in California and not the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan?
The Presbyterian Church in Taiwan is associated with political activism and many prominent figures, such as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), Taiwanese democracy pioneer Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) and former director of mental health at the WHO Lin Tsung-yi (林宗義), were Presbyterians. However, a survey by Academia Sinica showed that only about 4.5 percent of the population of Taiwan is Christian and about 1.5 percent is Catholic. Contrast this with the 80 percent of Taiwanese who identify as Taiwanese and can therefore be considered, in a broad sense, of being pro-Taiwanese independence.
Attacking overseas Taiwanese because of a provincial complex makes the shooter an enemy of Taiwanese. Attacking Taiwanese Presbyterians in California still conveys the warning against Taiwanese independence advocacy, but it is less overtly anti-Taiwanese.
The 68-year-old alleged perpetrator is a second-generation Mainlander born in Taichung, who went to university in Taiwan and taught at university before emigrating to the US, showing that he comes from a family background of a certain degree of means. However, he later separated from his wife and his life started to unravel — is it possible that he was somehow led astray and that this led him to perpetrate this act of terrorism?
Perhaps a psychiatric evaluation could help us understand the motive.
A possible triggering factor was updates made to the Taiwan-US relations fact sheet published on the US Department of State Web site, from which references to Taiwan being “a part of China” and that the US “does not support Taiwan independence” have been removed.
These changes fall short of altering Taiwan’s status, but they likely infuriated groups affiliated with the Chinese government and might have led to this terrorist attack.
Many people have already recommended that groups and organizations in Taiwan with similar links to the Chinese government should be thoroughly investigated to ensure that an attack does not happen in Taiwan.
A church is a sacred place. To attack people in such a place is therefore an extremely blasphemous act. Islamic extremists have been known to attack Christian churches, while the most common place where anti-Semites attack Jews is a synagogue.
What was the objective of a Chinese nationalist extremist wanting to murder people in a church where Taiwanese are known to gather, in California on the other side of the Pacific Ocean? Was it to warn Taiwanese not just in Taiwan, but also overseas, not to advocate for Taiwanese independence? Is this an indicator of foreign aggression?
The Economist last year ran an article calling Taiwan “the most dangerous place on Earth.” All Taiwanese need to be united and be vigilant against the possibility of further terrorist attacks.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under