For months now, with the US distracted by war in Europe, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has largely been free to accelerate his weapons programs. US President Joe Biden — along with US allies Japan and South Korea — needs to start making life harder for him.
Kim’s scientists have conducted 16 missile tests since the beginning of the year, possibly including a failed launch of a gargantuan Hwasong-17 ICBM. A new nuclear test might be imminent.
Left unchecked, North Korea could ultimately deploy a suite of delivery systems from multiple-warhead ICBMs to nuclear-armed hypersonic glide vehicles and sea-launched ballistic missiles. A bolstered arsenal could outmatch US missile defenses, enable Kim to threaten US cities with nuclear attack and raise doubts about whether the US would come to the aid of South Korea or Japan in a conflict.
Illustration: Yusha
Kim has little reason to slow down. Loose sanctions enforcement by China and Russia continues to help the North Korean leader maintain power and fund his weapons programs. The Ukraine war has underscored what can happen to countries that surrender their nuclear deterrents.
Moreover, keeping up a stream of flashy test launches gives the regime something to boast about internally, at a time when the economy appears to be reeling.
However, the US and its Asian allies are at the same time arguably better positioned to confront Kim than before.
The election of conservative South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol has brought Seoul into closer strategic alignment with Japan and the US than it has been in years. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chinese threats over Taiwan have prompted leaders in Tokyo to take a far more muscular stance on defense than would once have seemed possible. In Washington, too, a strong bipartisan consensus supports bolstering the US military posture in Asia.
All three countries seem more willing to risk tensions with China in pursuit of their goals.
During his current visit to South Korea and Japan, Biden should push for a more coordinated and forceful effort to contain the North.
The first priority should be to cut off the flow of money, materials and components North Korea needs to build its missiles and mobile launchers. The US should be as prepared to levy secondary sanctions on Chinese companies and banks for helping North Korea as for helping Russia. US Department of the Treasury and cybersecurity officials should redouble efforts to thwart the North’s cybertheft operations, from which it is estimated to reap hundreds of millions of US dollars a year.
The three allies should also work together to upgrade their defensive and offensive capabilities. The US should support Yoon’s desire to resume joint military exercises, deploy additional missile defenses to protect Seoul and speed development of a homegrown interceptor system similar to Israel’s Iron Dome.
While it would be unwise to deploy US nuclear weapons on the peninsula, as many South Korean conservatives want, the Biden administration should help Tokyo and Seoul improve their capacity to disrupt North Korean missile launches and destroy launchers in a crisis.
None of this should mean closing the door to diplomacy. Indeed, the US might want to propose specific sanctions relief or other incentives if Kim agrees to a moratorium on nuclear and missile tests.
However, the North Korean leader might be more likely to return to the table if the cost of not doing so rises.
The Editors are members of the Bloomberg Opinion editorial board.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations