More than one-fifth of all reptile species are threatened with extinction, which could have a “devastating” impact on the planet, a new study says.
The largest ever analysis of the state of the world’s reptiles, published in Nature, found that 21 percent of reptile species are facing extinction.
From lizards to snakes, such a loss could have disastrous impacts on ecosystems around the world, the study says.
Illustration: Mountain People
“We would lose a combined 15.6 billion years of evolutionary history if each of the 1,829 threatened reptiles became extinct,” said Neil Cox, coleader of the study and manager of the biodiversity assessment unit at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
“This is evolution that we could never get back. It would be a devastating loss. If we remove reptiles, it could change ecosystems radically, with unfortunate knock-on effects, such as increases in pest insects,” he said. “Biodiversity, including reptiles, underpins the ecosystem services that provide a healthy environment for people.”
Fifty-two experts analyzed data from the Global Reptile Assessment, which has received contributions from more than 900 scientists across six continents in the past 17 years.
While 1,829 of 10,196 species are known to be threatened, the status of 1,489 could not be determined.
Allowing for these data deficient species, the authors estimate that, in total, 21 percent are threatened.
The study was led by NatureServe, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Conservation International.
Although many reptiles live in arid environments such as deserts and scrubland, most species occur in forests, where they suffer from threats such as logging and conversion of land for agriculture.
The study found that 30 percent of forest-dwelling reptiles are at risk of extinction, compared with 14 percent in arid habitats. The king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah), for example, listed as globally “vulnerable,” is declining across much of its range in Asia, largely due to the loss of forest habitat.
Hunting is also a major threat to reptiles, especially turtles and crocodiles, half of which are at risk of extinction. Another major contributing factor is the introduction of invasive species.
Like birds or freshwater fish, reptiles tend to be less popular than iconic species of land mammals or marine life, but more reptile species are threatened than birds, suggesting more work is needed to protect them, said Mike Hoffmann, head of wildlife recovery at the Zoological Society of London and one of the scientists involved with the study.
“From turtles that breathe through their genitals to chameleons the size of a chickpea and giant tortoises that can live to more than 100, they’re utterly fascinating. Our hope is that this first-ever assessment of the world’s 10,000-plus reptiles helps put them in the spotlight and goes some way to highlighting this diversity, and just how much we have to lose,” Hoffmann said.
As well as controlling rats, mosquitoes and other “pests,” reptiles deliver many other benefits.
“They help disperse seeds, especially in island environments,” Hoffmann said. “We’ve also achieved many medical advances from studies of reptiles. Snake venom, for example, has resulted in critical drug discoveries, including for treating hypertension. The impending loss [of reptile species] could lead to wide-ranging and unforeseen impacts on our environment, and our own well-being.”
In Australia, home to about 10 percent of the world’s species, reptiles face a growing number of threats.
“Most of Australia’s threatened reptiles have declined due to habitat loss and predation by invasive cats and foxes,” said Nicki Mitchell from the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Western Australia, who also contributed to the study. “Climate change is an emerging threat to species confined to small fragments of habitat, as the microclimates they occupy will change and may no longer be optimal for a population to thrive.”
The study is not all doom.
Scientists said that conservation efforts to help other animals are likely to be protecting reptile species as collateral.
“We found, surprisingly, that if you set out to protect places where threatened birds, mammals and amphibians live together, you’ll simultaneously protect many more threatened reptiles,” said Bruce Young, coleader of the study, and chief zoologist and senior conservation scientist at NatureServe.
Yet reptiles also require direct, global efforts to protect them, Cox said.
The UN Convention on Biological Diversity is scheduled to convene COP15’s second phase in Kunming, China, later this year, where governments are to negotiate new targets to protect biodiversity, including reptiles.
“We need solid conservation plans, global policy agreement and to have countries fully invest in turning around the looming biodiversity crisis if we are to prevent the ongoing extinction catastrophe,” Cox said.
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS