Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) plans to express her opposition to war with a “Peace and Love Taiwan Rally” on Saturday next week.
Slogans about love and the argument that if you want peace, you must oppose war suggest that opposing war equals peace and love, but is that not the very message that Russian President Vladimir Putin seeks to convey to Ukraine, the country he has invaded?
It is ironic for such a slogan to be spoken at a time like this, with war between Russia and Ukraine still raging.
Of course, Ukrainians want peace, not war, but when Putin launched his invasion on Feb. 24, they only had two choices: surrender or fight back.
The first option — surrendering without a fight — could be presented as “anti-war” and avoiding military conflict. Furthermore, Putin would be happy, the US could give sanctuary to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his family, and Europe, the US and other countries could all breathe a sigh of relief.
The trouble is that behind the scenes of celebration, the problem would not have been solved, only postponed, possibly with even worse consequences.
A Ukraine that had been demilitarized, distanced from the EU and unprotected by NATO, could from then on only do what Putin wanted and meekly accept Russia’s domination and manipulation. Such a Ukraine could not be called an independent and sovereign nation; it would be a puppet and underling of Russia.
The worst thing is that an aggressor’s appetite is never satisfied and he is always looking for his next victim. Judging by the example of Chechnya, which submitted to Russia and has now become a pawn in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the next time Russia gets ambitious and invades another country, it will be Ukraine’s turn to be Russia’s pawn and cannon fodder.
Would that not mean paying an even heavier price for what it might have avoided this year?
History teaches that wishful neutrality and opposition to war are mere illusions when a country runs into an ambitious invader. Ukraine is not blind. Of course it remembers how then-neutral European countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Norway were ravaged by Hitler’s Nazis during World War II.
Of course, Zelenskiy knows that when living next door to a bellicose neighbor, opposition to war is not the path to peace, but the road to slavery. It is a luxury that comes at a heavy cost. That is why Zelenskiy fought instead of surrendering. It is also why Finland and Sweden are now thinking of joining NATO.
Taiwan, like Ukraine, also has a bellicose neighbor, so why should Ukraine’s way of seeking peace not be a model for Taiwan?
Indeed, a weak or small country with a great enemy before it is in no position to shout “no to war,” because peace does not depend on the goodwill of one’s enemy, still less on the kind of opposition to war that involves disarming and demilitarizing.
Will those who shout: “Give me peace and nothing else” or “Give me peace or you do not love Taiwan” bring peace to Taiwan or lead it down the road to slavery? Do they really love Taiwan, or are they harming it?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor of National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS