On Tuesday last week, China confirmed it had sealed a security pact with the Solomon Islands.
“China and Solomon Islands have officially signed a framework agreement on bilateral security cooperation,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文彬) told a news conference.
Based on a leaked document on social media, the Solomon Islands “may request China to send police, armed police, military personnel and other law enforcement and armed forces,” and that Beijing could send ships for stopovers and to replenish supplies.
As the pact could give China a military foothold in the South Pacific, countries in the Pacific region have voiced concerns.
On Wednesday last week, the People’s Liberation Army Daily ran an article titled “Troops need to prepare for war,” in which it said: “Men need to prepare ... in terms of capability and even mindset.”
If China wishes to transform from a green-water navy to a blue-water navy — meaning a maritime force capable of operating globally — then it needs a destination for it to send troops, and a legitimate reason to do so.
Located 5,000km from China’s Fujian Province, the Solomon Islands is in the southern hemisphere. As the seasons there are the opposite of those in the northern hemisphere, the Solomon Islands could not be a more ideal naval base for distance training.
Whether it is the Shandong or Liaoning aircraft carrier, they would no longer need to loiter in the Taiwan Strait, but could sail through the Bashi Channel or the Miyako Strait and head out into the Pacific Ocean. This move to boost the scale and strength of its military drills proves that China’s People’s Liberation Army has adjusted its direction and resolve.
With the Russian Ministry of Defense having said that its Moskva guided-missile cruiser, the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea fleet, sank on April 14, there is no end in sight to the war in Ukraine.
As it focuses on staying above the fray, China’s ploy with the Solomon Islands is about bolstering its defense plans in the South Pacific. It is also a harbinger of Beijing’s grand strategy and long game: The formation of a military alliance to take on the democracies of the West.
As an important stakeholder in the emerging dynamics of the Pacific region, Taiwan needs to be on its guard and make its next move carefully.
Shih Ya-hsuan is an associate professor at National Kaohsiung Normal University’s Department of Geography.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of