With the Russian invasion of Ukraine highlighting concerns that Taiwan might be next to be attacked, the erroneous airing of news tickers announcing that Chinese missiles had struck New Taipei City on the Chinese Television System (CTS) aroused the interest of international media.
CTS is part of the Taiwan Broadcasting System (TBS), along with Public Television Service (PTS), which last month revealed that a contractor in February had mistakenly deleted news clips from its digital archive. The mistakes at these stations must be attributed to systemic problems within TBS.
Squabbling between the pan-blue and pan-green camps has left the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation without its quota of members for a management team or board of directors, which should have been filled in 2019. For the past two years, they have had to fare with term extensions and acting members.
The management team’s hands are tied, and unable to make changes, they are obliged to follow precedent. The Ministry of Culture, as the overseeing authority, must resolve the structural problems in the organization.
The National Communications Commission (NCC) needs to determine whether the news ticker errors contravened the Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法), which states: “The contents of radio/television programs shall not … disrupt public order or adversely affect good social customs.”
Taiwan has 18 television news channels serving 9 million households, making it one of the highest-density markets in the world. Fierce competition for advertising and viewers has led to a deterioration in quality and diversity of content. This has been a disservice to viewers for many years.
News media are intended to provide public oversight, but the current crop of TV programs and daily political talk shows have been hijacked by the pan-blue and pan-green political parties, exacerbating social divisions.
Hosts unbeholden to term limits exploit their influence to maximize their interests, some promoting the “blue fighters” and blurring the boundaries between media and politics. Others defend the policies of the government of the day, irrespective of the party in power.
The NCC should establish a transparent year-by-year evaluation system and a six-year license renewal review to remove poorly performing news channels from the market and attract better ones.
Second, it should limit the evening chat-style political opinion programs to 30 minutes and introduce more international news reports to expand awareness of global issues.
Third, it should implement a regular license renewal system to encourage talking head shows to introduce more diverse content that explores major issues such as education, housing, the aging population, international politics and finance, or by featuring guests from diverse backgrounds. The hosts should also be regularly changed to better address audience’s needs.
The NCC should not approve more news channels until these reforms are implemented.
The commission has reluctantly granted a license to Mirror TV’s news station, with a number of provisions attached along with a probationary period, during which it has changed directors on several occasions. There is reason to believe it has contravened other conditions.
Additionally, one of its major shareholders has ties with banks and was involved in a financial scandal, going against the principle of separating news media from the financial entities they cover.
The NCC has an opportunity to address these issues, and it should take it.
Jang Show-ling is an adjunct professor in National Taiwan University’s economics department.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS