While reporting on the COVID-19 situation last week, Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said that the 1922 SMS Contact Tracing System would gradually be replaced by the Taiwan Social Distancing app, but a precondition for scrapping the 1922 system is that at least 12 million people must have downloaded the app.
While the policy change is based on practical considerations, the Ministry of Health and Welfare should take into account the following issues and propose complementary measures.
First, when customers enter a commercial establishment, will the staff have to check them one by one as to whether they have installed the app?
Should staff also have to make sure that customers have the Bluetooth function on their smartphone or other mobile device switched on?
If a consumer only turns on Bluetooth when entering the store to show the staff that they are complying with the regulations, but then turns it off — to save power or for some other reason — would that not be a loophole in the implementation of the policy?
Second, when people use public transport, such as the MRT, train or bus, if there is no way to ensure that passengers have Bluetooth switched on, what can be done about the resulting loophole?
Third, from the start of the policy to wear a mask when not at home, the majority of people have come to understand the common sense of wearing a mask in public places, but one still sees some people pulling down their masks when they think no one is looking, or wearing them on their chins, or not fully covering their mouths and noses.
You can tell at a glance whether someone is wearing a mask properly, but some people still do not. By contrast, you obviously cannot tell at a glance whether someone has installed the app or whether they have turned on Bluetooth on their mobile device.
If some people do not comply with the regulations, what feasible measures does the Ministry of Health and Welfare have in mind to deal with it?
At present there is a twin-track system whereby people have to use either the SMS system or handwritten registration when entering commercial premises or using public transport. Even if the app becomes the norm, there are practical reasons why the alternative method of handwritten registration cannot be abolished.
If this change of policy leads to a situation where all three systems — the app, the SMS system and handwritten registration — are all being used, could it lead to shortcomings arising from the existence of these parallel systems?
These are all questions that the ministry should seriously consider.
Jian Bo-ren is a lawyer and a doctoral student at National Taiwan Normal University’s Department of Civic Education and Leadership.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
RSS