On Wednesday last week, International Air Transport Association (IATA) director-general Willie Walsh told an online news conference that Hong Kong is no longer an international flight hub due to the government’s restrictions on inbound flights and its requirements for passenger quarantine.
“It’s effectively off the map now, and I think it’s going to be difficult for Hong Kong to recover,” Walsh said. “It’s going to lag significantly behind the recovery that we’re seeing elsewhere and has led to a tough time for all airlines operating there.”
Walsh’s remarks were undoubtedly a warning sign to Cathay Pacific Airways, which is based in Hong Kong. They were also a wake-up call for Taiwan’s aviation industry and Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport.
First, Hong Kong International Airport was repeatedly paralyzed by the anti-extradition law and democracy demonstrations over the past few years. Then, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Hong Kong government adopted circuit-breaker measures for international passenger flights and suspended all transit passenger operations.
As a result, the airport has gradually lost its international flight hub status, and Cathay Pacific Airways’ operations have suffered. Even with a fleet of cargo planes similar to that of China Airlines, the company is finding it difficult to extricate itself from the nightmare of constant financial losses.
China Airlines and EVA Airways, Taiwan’s two largest international airlines, heavily relied on cargo flights last year to generate substantial profits. Their revenue from passenger flights during the same period was dismal. With no sign of improvement in the global COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of this year, the two major airlines would inevitably continue to rely on their cargo-based operations in hopes of continued profitability.
Although passenger flights are not profitable at the moment, they are still crucial to maintaining the competitiveness of the airlines’ flight networks, and the status of Taoyuan airport as an international flight hub.
While Hong Kong airport has lost its role as an international flight hub, Taoyuan airport has failed to absorb any transit passengers to consolidate its role as a hub connecting Southeast Asia and North America.
Just like Hong Kong airport, Taoyuan airport might slowly lose its geographical advantage due to the suspension of passenger transit operations in May last year.
Since then, connecting passengers have been absorbed by Singapore, Tokyo, Incheon and other airports seeking to consolidate their positions, and such passengers can generate revenue, to a lesser or larger degree. In particular, the Singaporean government’s subsidies and support for its aviation industry are key to keeping Singapore Changi Airport an international flight center.
As President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) wrote on Facebook earlier this month, the goal of COVID-19 prevention at this stage is the new Taiwanese model of “zero serious cases and effective control of minor ones,” with the aim of minimizing the effects of the pandemic on people’s livelihood and Taiwan’s economy.
In that case, the Central Epidemic Command Center should also consider reopening Taoyuan airport to transit passengers. By doing so, the airport will be able to consolidate its position as an international flight hub, while Taiwan tries to maintain its competitiveness with Japan, Singapore and South Korea.
Anderson Fu is a senior traffic manager at an airline.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS