On March 30, the National Development Council and five ministries released a road map for achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, detailing four major transformations, including energy transformation, and 12 key strategies for achieving the goal.
The issues involved are complicated and intermeshed. Finance, the lifeblood of the real economy, is certain to play an important role. Some international examples might clarify how it might work in practice.
The biggest highlight of the COP26 climate summit in November last year was the establishment of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, with its commitment to building new business models that lend or invest in net-zero assets to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, with a medium-term target for 2030. More than 450 financial institutions — with assets of up to US$130 trillion — have so far signed up to the program.
Alliance members have committed to considering their clients’ emissions targets as their own. Financial institutions are to take their total emissions and emission levels as the inspection standard, meaning that in addition to reducing carbon emissions at their own business offices, they must consider the emissions data of customers and investments. The aim is to drive all of society toward net-zero emissions.
Starting in June, the European Banking Authority (EBA) is to require banks to disclose their “green asset ratio” as a key performance indicator of sustainable finance. The higher their percentage of investments and loans supporting the transformation to green energy, the higher their performance rating.
Specific EBA projects include the manufacturing of equipment using renewable resources, the manufacturing of transportation vehicles using low-carbon processes, the manufacturing of energy-efficient residential equipment and hydrogen production equipment, power generation using renewable resources, energy storage, low-energy buildings, low-energy data centers and the removal of carbon dioxide.
The EBA is also assessing whether banks that lend to companies with high carbon emissions and high energy consumption should calculate the loans using a higher risk weighting, which would increase the cost of such loans.
The EU is encouraging banks to lend to the green energy industry and has begun to call in loans to industries with high carbon emissions — a two-pronged approach.
That is why Bill Gates in November last year said that he and his foundation had divested stocks related to fossil fuels, as those companies would soon lose value.
The theme of this year’s International Earth Day, which falls on Friday next week, is “Invest in Our Planet.” In addition to highlighting the seriousness of environmental issues such as climate change, it is hoped that finance would lead other industries in facilitating energy transition.
Honda Chen is head of the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance’s sustainable finance office.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
RSS