On March 30, the National Development Council and five ministries released a road map for achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, detailing four major transformations, including energy transformation, and 12 key strategies for achieving the goal.
The issues involved are complicated and intermeshed. Finance, the lifeblood of the real economy, is certain to play an important role. Some international examples might clarify how it might work in practice.
The biggest highlight of the COP26 climate summit in November last year was the establishment of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, with its commitment to building new business models that lend or invest in net-zero assets to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, with a medium-term target for 2030. More than 450 financial institutions — with assets of up to US$130 trillion — have so far signed up to the program.
Alliance members have committed to considering their clients’ emissions targets as their own. Financial institutions are to take their total emissions and emission levels as the inspection standard, meaning that in addition to reducing carbon emissions at their own business offices, they must consider the emissions data of customers and investments. The aim is to drive all of society toward net-zero emissions.
Starting in June, the European Banking Authority (EBA) is to require banks to disclose their “green asset ratio” as a key performance indicator of sustainable finance. The higher their percentage of investments and loans supporting the transformation to green energy, the higher their performance rating.
Specific EBA projects include the manufacturing of equipment using renewable resources, the manufacturing of transportation vehicles using low-carbon processes, the manufacturing of energy-efficient residential equipment and hydrogen production equipment, power generation using renewable resources, energy storage, low-energy buildings, low-energy data centers and the removal of carbon dioxide.
The EBA is also assessing whether banks that lend to companies with high carbon emissions and high energy consumption should calculate the loans using a higher risk weighting, which would increase the cost of such loans.
The EU is encouraging banks to lend to the green energy industry and has begun to call in loans to industries with high carbon emissions — a two-pronged approach.
That is why Bill Gates in November last year said that he and his foundation had divested stocks related to fossil fuels, as those companies would soon lose value.
The theme of this year’s International Earth Day, which falls on Friday next week, is “Invest in Our Planet.” In addition to highlighting the seriousness of environmental issues such as climate change, it is hoped that finance would lead other industries in facilitating energy transition.
Honda Chen is head of the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance’s sustainable finance office.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS