Many people think that during the height of pro-democracy student movements in the 1980s and 1990s, musicians played a part in the protests. However, the truth is, only a handful of musicians were willing to stand up for the cause at the time.
In an era in which one ethnic group dominated the cultural and entertainment propaganda machine and monopolized the right to expression in music, most musicians in Taiwan chose to cooperate with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government by self-censoring their ideology and works, distancing themselves as much as they could from the democratic movement that was taking place on the streets and campuses.
Anyone who participated in the pro-democracy movements is very likely to remember that the songs used to boost morale when parading on the streets in protests were a few sad, old Taiwanese songs, such as Bang Chhun-hong (望春風, Longing for the Spring Breeze), Hope You Come Back Soon (望你早歸) and My Hometown under the Sunset (黃昏的故鄉). Young people on campuses could only seek nourishment from the protest songs from the 1960s in the West to nurture the spirit of resistance.
It is often said that music can give one strength and tear down walls. However, most Taiwanese musicians chose to remain silent in that era.
Chiu Chen (邱晨), who passed away on Thursday last week at the age of 72, was one of the few exceptions. He was not only personally involved in the pro-democracy movements, he also wrote songs for them.
In most of the obituaries about Chiu, media coverage focused on the well-known Taiwanese campus folk songs that he wrote, such as Little Jasmine (小茉莉), The Wind Tells Me (風告訴我), as well as popular hits like It’s Tonight (就在今夜) and Why Did I Dream of Him? (為何夢見他). Unfortunately, the songs Chiu wrote during the Taiwanese democracy movement in the 1980s and 1990s were rarely mentioned.
These songs include The Green Flag Raised to the Sky (綠色旗升上天) in support of the Democratic Progressive Party, Taiwan’s first political party to rally forces outside the governing KMT; Taiwan’s first reportage-inspired music album, Tefuye (特富野), which voices support for an indigenous young man, Tang Ying-shen (湯英伸); the Big Banyan Tree in the South (南國的大榕樹), written in memory of Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who set himself on fire in support of freedom of speech; and Crossing the Bridge (過橋), a satirical death song on the so-called “10,000-year legislature” (萬年國會) that he wrote for the Wild Lily student movement, in which I was personally involved.
It can be said that, apart from Chen Ming-chang’s (陳明章) Blacklist Studio (黑名單工作室), Chiu was one of the very few musicians who supported the Wild Lily student movement through music at the time.
In the long history of the world, music, like other forms of entertainment and art, has also played a part in creating countless moving moments in the human rights, democracy and independence movements.
Musicians have incredible power in driving the development of civilization.
May Chiu rest in peace. Hopefully, the music he composed for Taiwan’s democracy movement will still be sung by many generations to come.
Vincent Chen is a manager in the information and communications industry, and former publicity section convener of the Wild Lily student movement.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which