At the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the media predicted a potential “decapitation strike” from Moscow. An in-depth discussion of the issue seems necessary in Taiwan.
There are many ways of launching a decapitation strike, which seeks to assinate a national leader. Such an approach was often used by the US in its conflicts, and could be a quick move for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) if it attacks Taiwan.
London’s Sunday Times on March 3 published a report headlined: “Volodymyr Zelenskiy survives three assassination attempts in days.” It said that Russia had dispatched not only troops to Ukraine but also the Kremlin-backed paramilitary Wagner Group along with Chechen special forces for decapitation strikes. Luckily, Zelenskiy escaped all three attempts.
Despite Russia’s failure to kill Zelenskiy, Ukraine must remain extremely vigilant.
“Decapitation” is a military term for the use of ballistic and precision-guided missiles to assassinate a national leader or destroy a presidential office, to demoralize and severely weaken an enemy.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has repeatedly held military exercises at its Zhurihe Training Base in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, during which it used a scale replica of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei to simulate a decapitation strike.
Russia has the world’s second-most powerful military, with state-of-the-art satellite systems, advanced weapons and the latest hypersonic missiles. It would not be difficult for Moscow to conduct a decapitation strike against Kyiv through an air raid, as the target and location of the strike are clear and definite.
It has also been reported that Zelenskiy has not left his office since the war’s outbreak late last month.
Take for example the third day of Russia’s invasion on Feb. 26, when it launched missile attacks on Ukrainian military facilities and major cities. Zelenskiy appeared in the plaza in front of the presidential office and filmed himself vowing to defend his country to the death.
It is evident that the Ukrainian presidential office, which holds significant symbolic meaning for Ukrainians, is not the first choice or locked target of Russian attacks. Otherwise, as Russia is capable of firing hundreds of missiles to destroy military bases across Ukraine, it is surely capable of destroying the building where the Ukrainian president works.
Avoiding Zelenskiy’s death or the destruction of the Ukrainian presidential office is the result of international factors external of Russia and internal political pressure. As Russian President Vladimir Putin continues the so-called “special military operation,” his strategy is to use war to force Ukraine to the negotiation table, not eradicate the country.
The purpose of Russia’s supposed decapitation attempts was to hijack Zelenskiy, not assassinate him, but as tension mounts during a continued war, whether Russia attempts other decapitation methods is a possibility.
In Taiwan’s 2020 Han Kuang exercises, the military simulated strikes against PLA and Chinese secret agents targeting the Presidential Office Building and other central government agencies in Taipei’s Boai Special Zone (博愛特區), while training for countermeasures against the CCP’s hijacking of the Taiwanese president. From the situation in the Russia-Ukraine war, the scenario set in the Han Kuang military drill is not impossible.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS