Three foreign visitors tested positive for COVID-19 last week after they were exempted from quarantine regulations to travel to Taipei on invitations to attend the annual Smart City Summit and Expo. One of them tested positive on their first day in Taiwan on Monday, while the others initially tested negative, but were on Wednesday found to have the virus, after attending the summit’s events the day before.
The other 27 international visitors were placed in isolation for 10 days, and the events they were supposed to attend were canceled.
Thirty-eight close contacts of the three cases were asked to isolate, 119 contacts were asked to practice self-health management, and 5,045 people who attended the opening ceremony were asked to monitor their health, including several government officials.
The “specialized bubble” plan for the summit was the first such quarantine-free arrangement after Taiwan’s border was reopened for foreign business travelers on March 7, and the way the situation was handled raises questions about how well the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) had planned the arrangement. Unlike “diplomatic bubbles” for foreign officials or important public figures that require the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to submit COVID-19 safety plans to the CECC, specialized bubble applications can be submitted by several government agencies.
The CECC requires specialized bubble organizers to designate vehicles that transport participants to events and staff members to accompany them to limit contact between travelers and the general public.
However, the summit bubble sparked public concern, as some visitors were tested at the airport, while others were tested upon arrival at their hotels.
Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the CECC, said that he had approved the National Development Council’s initial plan to allow visitors to be tested at their hotels, but the council in the week before the summit submitted a revised plan that required testing at the airport. He did not approve the revised plan before the participants arrived, Chen said.
However, testing at the airport or hotels were both acceptable as long as visitors were tested on the day of their arrival, he said, adding that bubble arrangements are not designed to guarantee that they will involve no COVID-19 cases. Reopening the border was inevitable, he said, acknowledging the challenge to limit effects on the public — severe cases, deaths and widespread stress.
Chen also said there were flaws in the way the summit organizers segregated foreign and domestic visitors, adding that the regulations for bubbles would be under rolling review and that the CECC is learning from each bubble arrangement.
Although the incident seems under control so far, it revealed underlying problems, including with regard to communication between government agencies, the monitoring of the execution of bubble arrangements and ambiguous standards for their case-by-case approval. Communication between the council and the CECC via official documents was too slow, as the CECC apparently could not assess the new plan in time. The hotels where bubble participants stayed, the council and the organizers all had insufficient disease prevention expertise.
The CECC has no clear, transparent standards for specialized bubbles, and although case-by-case reviews might be more flexible, they come with uncertainties, as those involved in the arrangements cannot rely on general standards when executing the rules.
Chen and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) have reassured the public that the three cases posed low risk to local communities.
However, the government must adapt its messaging, so that the public is less emotionally affected by the rise and fall in daily COVID-19 case numbers, and Taiwanese know what risks further border openings entail and how they can mitigate them.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence