Even a mild case of COVID-19 can damage the brain and addle thinking, scientists found in a study that highlights the illness’ alarming impact on mental function.
Researchers identified COVID-19-associated brain damage months after infection, including in the region linked to smell, and shrinkage in size equivalent to as much as a decade of normal aging.
The changes were linked to cognitive decline in the study, which was published on Monday in the journal Nature.
The findings represent striking evidence of the virus’ impact on the central nervous system.
More research would be required to understand whether the evidence from the Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging at the University of Oxford means COVID-19 would exacerbate the global burden of dementia — which cost an estimated US$1.3 trillion in the year the pandemic began — and other neurodegenerative conditions.
“It is a very novel study with conclusive data,” said Avindra Nath, clinical director of the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, who was not involved in the research. “The findings are very intriguing, with important implications for the population at large.”
SARS-CoV-2 is widely considered a respiratory pathogen that attacks the lungs.
However, taking a narrow view of it misses myriad neurologic complications — including confusion, stroke and neuromuscular disorders — that manifest during the acute phase of the illness. Other effects like impaired concentration, headache, sensory disturbances, depression and even psychosis might persist for months as part of a constellation of symptoms termed long COVID-19.
To investigate changes in the brain, neuroscientist Gwenaelle Douaud and colleagues leveraged the world’s largest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) database. Initial MRI scans of the brains of 785 volunteers were taken before the pandemic began as part of UK Biobank research, which marries large-scale genomic and detailed clinical data for half a million people.
A subsequent scan was taken an average of 38 months later. By then, 401 participants had tested positive for COVID-19. The uninfected remainder served as a control group that was similar to the survivors in age, sex and many risk factors, including blood pressure, obesity, smoking, socioeconomic status and diabetes. The participants in the study, aged 51 to 81, were mostly Caucasian.
“We were quite surprised to see some clear differences in how the brain had changed in the participants who have become infected,” Douaud said in an interview.
Whether the effects persist, or can be partially reversed as neuronal networks repair, requires further investigation, she said.
“The brain is ‘plastic’ and can heal itself,” she added.
Among those infected an average of four-and-a-half months prior to their second scan, the researchers found a greater reduction in gray matter thickness in the regions of the brain associated with smell, known as the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus.
The finding might help explain the impaired olfaction many COVID-19 patients experience, as a result of either direct viral damage or inflammation spurred by the body’s immune response to the virus.
A loss of gray matter, which makes up the outermost layer of the brain, represents degeneration, said Leah Beauchamp, a neuropharmacologist at the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health in Melbourne.
“This is really concerning,” she said.
The infected group also displayed a 0.2 to 2 percent greater reduction in brain size compared with those who had not been infected and showed greater cognitive decline based on their performance undertaking complex tasks.
This was associated with atrophy, or shrinkage, in a specific part of the cerebellum — an area at the back and bottom of the brain — linked to cognition. Differences between infected and non-infected participants was more marked in older people.
“What is going to be pertinent now is to identify the mechanisms that are leading to this degeneration in the acute phase of disease so that we can attempt to intervene,” Beauchamp said.
Studies of blood and central nervous system samples from patients are needed to tease out the mechanisms that result in these brain changes, said Serena Spudich, the Gilbert H. Glaser professor of neurology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.
Recent research revealed the plasticity of brain connectivity and structure, she said.
The findings suggest there might be renewal of damaged neuronal pathways that could ultimately result in full recovery for affected patients, she said.
“We are fortunate to have extremely resilient brains that can function with many potential insults without experiencing any impairment,” she said in an e-mail. “Hopefully, these neuroimaging findings equate to few clinical consequences in most people who are infected with SARS-CoV-2.”
Study participants were not selected because they were experiencing long COVID-19 symptoms. It is possible some of the findings were incidental and have no impact.
Still, Nath and Beauchamp said it would be important to identify whether long COVID-19 symptoms correlate with brain abnormalities or the results of any other pathology tests.
The size of the changes on individual scans were “subtle” and not visible to the naked eye, Douaud said.
A 0.2 percent reduction in gray matter represents about a year of normal aging in an older person’s brain. A 2 percent reduction represents about 10 years of aging.
Almost all of the infected participants recovered at home, which suggests the findings might be relevant for the majority of COVID-19 survivors worldwide.
Among the 15 who were hospitalized for COVID-19, there were hints of even stronger and more widely distributed effects in the brain, Douaud said.
The research supports growing evidence that brain-based changes can occur following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in people who did not need hospitalization, said Joanna Hellmuth, a neurologist and assistant professor at the University of California, San Francisco’s Memory and Aging Center.
“Future research efforts can help us understand if these brain changes are clinically relevant, and if they associate with specific neurological issues after COVID,” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
The victory of Vice President William Lai (賴清德) in January’s presidential election raised questions about the future of China’s unification strategy toward Taiwan. A decade ago, the assumption in Bejing had been that deepening economic ties with Taiwan would bring about a political accommodation eventually leading to political integration. Not only has this not happened, but it hastened the opposite. Taiwanese are more concerned with safeguarding their political independence than they have ever been. China’s preferred party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has not won a presidential election since 2012. Clearly, Beijing’s strategy is not working. Polling conducted by the Institute of European