Media reports that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is recruiting business intelligence analysts have critics saying that local universities’ political science departments would be hard pressed to produce such talent. Their opinions are not unfounded, and it has led me to think about what is amiss in the nation’s political science education.
Based on my 14 years of observation, local political science departments are too focused on publishing papers and analyzing issues, instead of teaching students to think about counterstrategies.
The main goal of political science is to develop students into statespeople or strategists, but the local education system seems to be focused on training students to analyze situations, rather than providing solutions to “what should we do if we were in this situation?”
For example, in the case of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, professors would be offering various in-depth analyses of the issue in class, placing a lot of scope on the background information of the two countries.
However, situational analysis is merely the starting point. If training is only focused on this aspect, students would be conducting data collection, and spending invaluable time and effort on information that many have access to.
This is the reason why most Taiwanese do not think much of political science majors, with many considering politics a topic that even a taxi driver can offer their two cents on.
The most important trait of a strategist or statesperson is the ability to come up with counterstrategies.
Taiwanese education lacks the facility to train students to think critically: If we were in this situation, what should we do and what should be our next move? This is one of the reasons we have been missing out on great opportunities to boost our international profile.
Take Taiwan and India, for example: We have missed the opportunity to exchange maximum benefits with India and reap concrete benefits from them.
A small country has every possibility to stand up to a big country, as long as it has talented strategists. That is why Ukraine has the means to deter a Russian invasion. Just like the Three Kingdoms period, the warlord Liu Bei’s (劉備) camp was originally the weakest among the three. However, with the help of the brilliant military strategist Zhuge Liang (諸葛亮) by his side, he soon built up a kingdom strong enough to contend with the other two.
Jason Lee has a doctorate in international politics from National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Rita Wang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS