As tensions grew between Russia and Ukraine toward the end of last year, with frequent rumors of a possible war, the US and other NATO countries during mediations with Russia gave the impression that they might intervene militarily, and threatened to impose economic and trade sanctions.
However, they could not quell Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ambition or prevent the flames of war.
As the war progresses after the failure of diplomatic and economic sanctions, these countries seem to have drawn back from the idea of armed intervention.
Consequently, Taiwan, which is in a similar situation to Ukraine, has suddenly become a focus worldwide, and even the second-most popular search term on Twitter.
On Thursday, just as war between Russia and Ukraine broke out, the Taipei Forum held a seminar on Taiwan’s security.
Speaking at the event, former National Security Bureau director-general Tsai Der-sheng (蔡得勝) said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is to hold its 20th National Congress in autumn.
Maintaining stability is currently more important to the CCP than maintaining sovereignty, so the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is unlikely to cause any trouble before or immediately after the congress, he said.
Although this conclusion is based on various sources of information, in light of the forecasts and the reactions of the US and other NATO countries to the situation in Ukraine, could the assumption that the PLA does not plan to intrude on Taiwan before the congress be equally wrong?
Given the existence of opposition to Chinese President and CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平) within the CCP, if the 20th National Congress signifies Xi’s final deployment of power, he might use such means as “unifying with Taiwan by force” to smoothly achieve his goals at the congress. By “maintaining sovereignty” to support his aim of “maintaining stability,” he might put himself in a more favorable strategic position.
At a time when other countries are fretting over the situation in Ukraine, there is no guarantee that the CCP will not use the opportunity to take a risk.
Although there are geographical and other differences between the Russia-Ukraine situation and that which exists across the Taiwan Strait, in both cases a major power is using its military might to threaten a weaker opponent.
Taiwan should neither put its security in the hands of outsiders, nor believe that it is safe. Rather, it should be prepared for war and not let its guard down in the face of the enemy.
As Taiwan specialist Ryan Hass wrote in the Taipei Times, Taiwan must strengthen its political unity and national security to counter the fatalism that Beijing aims to induce (“Ryan Hass On Taiwan: Learning the right lessons from Ukraine for Taiwan,” Feb. 21, page 8).
In early 1941, before then-US president Franklin Roosevelt intervened in World War II, he proposed the Lend-Lease Act to help countries resisting the Axis powers to fight their common enemy — a decision that had far-reaching effects.
Now that war has broken out between Russia and Ukraine, let us hope that the US, Japan and other countries do something more effective for security in the Taiwan Strait to help Taiwan resist the threat from communist China.
Sung Chi-cheng is an assistant professor at Shih Hsin University’s Center for General Education and a former colonel instructor at the National Defense University’s War College.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS