Hong Kong’s COVID-19 containment campaign is taking its greatest toll on the hundreds of thousands of migrants who work as live-in domestics in the territory.
Scores have been evicted or sacked after testing positive for COVID-19, by employers who do not want the virus in their households, local rights groups say.
Some are facing steep fines for breaching Hong Kong’s two-person limit on gatherings — a rule that has upended the long-standing tradition of domestic workers meeting up with friends on their single day off.
On Feb. 19 and 20, foreign domestic workers, known locally as “helpers,” accounted for more than one in every four people fined for breaching the territory’s COVID-19 protocols, even though they account for less than 5 percent of the population.
The fines can be as much as HK$10,000 (US$1,281) — twice the minimum monthly wage for live-in domestic workers.
One 57-year-old Philippine woman said that she was fined HK$5,000 after lowering her mask for “five seconds” to take a telephone call.
“My friend’s employer got out a taxi and the police saw her mask on her chin, but no penalty,” the worker said. “For me, it is discrimination, because we are domestic helpers.”
She asked to remain anonymous because she was afraid to get in trouble with the police.
“Police will act on the basis of any actual circumstances in accordance with the law,” a police spokeswoman said.
Helpers work in about 10 percent of Hong Kong households. Mostly from the Philippines and Indonesia, the 340,000-member workforce is an often-overlooked, but critical part of Hong Kong’s US$345 billion economy, providing live-in child care, and cooking and cleaning services for as little as HK$4,630 per month.
However, they do not enjoy the rights or privileges of other long-time foreign workers in the territory. Unlike professional expatriates, helpers are never eligible for “permanent resident” status.
They depend on their employers not only for shelter and wages, but also for their visas; if they lose their job, they have two weeks to find another before they must leave.
As Hong Kong records more COVID-19 cases, domestic workers are facing not only the looming threat of getting sick, but also severe financial anxiety, said Johannie Tong (唐曉昕), a community relations officer at Mission For Migrant Workers.
“It’s very unfortunate that the [Hong Kong] government hasn’t really commented or given guidelines on how migrant workers should be treated during this COVID crisis,” Tong said. “That’s left to the employers to decide.”
Reports of families being separated by Hong Kong’s strict policies on COVID-19 isolation and hospitalization have made households especially cautious, and at the same time, facilities are overrun, so authorities are telling people with mild infections to quarantine at home.
One 31-year-old helper said her employer refused to let her quarantine at home, adding that she could only return after posting three negative test results.
Without food or warm clothes, she spent a 10°C night camped outside a hospital before being moved to a shelter.
According to Hong Kong law, firing a helper for being sick could lead to prosecution and a fine of up to HK$100,000.
HELP for Domestic Workers executive director Manisha Wijesinghe said that her organization raised more than HK$1.2 million within a week to support COVID-19-positive helpers who had been evicted by employers, as well as to fly workers to their home countries and help others access counseling.
“There is definitely an element of human rights issues, but this is not isolated to COVID-19,” Wijesinghe said. “COVID-19 has really thrust these issues into the spotlight.”
The government has expressed alarm over helpers’ regular Sunday gatherings, when they gather in parks and on sidewalks to spend their days off with friends.
“Ask your helpers to stay home,” Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) said in a Feb. 18 news conference. “We will not show mercy anymore.”
That extended to a crowdfunding effort that sprung up to assist helpers facing steep fines.
A campaign had raised US$107,000 before government officials said that the effort might be breaking the law.
“You may have good intentions, but we can’t rule out that you are maliciously obstructing our whole anti-epidemic effort,” Hong Kong Secretary for Labor and Welfare Law Chi-kwong (羅致光) told Commercial Radio on Feb. 20.
“You are helping a big group of foreign domestic workers to congregate,” Law added.
For the 57-year-old woman who was fined for lowering her mask, it is the legal requirement to live with employers that made her vulnerable to the harsh COVID-19-related penalties.
“We are in our employer’s house for six days a week,” she said. “Then, as soon as the police can see us chatting with each other, they hand out a fine.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS