The Taipei City Council on Monday decided to freeze the NT$1.3 million (US$46,716) budget for the annual forum between Taipei and Shanghai if Chinese military aircraft and ships continue to patrol near Taiwan. The city council should be commended for defying Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), as the forum should not be held.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) does not allow politicians to hold events that are not in line with party objectives, and the forum is no exception. It is intended to push China’s unification agenda — which most Taiwanese oppose — and the use of public funds for Ko to attend such an event is inappropriate. Arguably, he should not be allowed to visit China — an antagonistic enemy state — at all.
That Taipei City Councilor Pan Hwai-tzong (潘懷宗), convener of the pro-China New Party, agreed that the forum should not be held amid poor cross-strait relations shows how much aversion toward the CCP exists in Taiwan. Ko, as chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party, a prominent third-force political party, should not entertain the idea of interacting with CCP officials amid such hostilities.
Ill intentions might not motivate Ko to attend the forum, but he is overly idealistic about what the event can achieve for Taiwan. He has said on numerous occasions that the “two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family.” It is unclear what Ko means — whether he is implying that there are many Taiwanese with relatives in China or that Taiwanese and Chinese share cultural values — but the remarks have been problematic for the mayor.
Asked by reporters in 2019 to explain the statements, Ko said that “it is an expression of attitude, meaning ‘we will be friendly to your people, but we want you to be friendly to Taiwanese in return.’”
How that is different from what Taiwan would expect from relations with any country is unclear.
Last month, Ko said that the goal of the forum is to jointly build the “Chinese dream,” as “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one family” and “people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are Chinese of the same race and speak the same language,” a Central News Agency report said.
Perhaps Ko should consider what Hong Kongers think of the “Chinese dream.” Does he believe Singapore should discuss unification with China, since both countries “speak the same language” and have majority populations “of the same race”? What of Canada, the UK and the US? No such combination of countries considers unification, despite sharing a common history, culture and values. What would Taiwan’s indigenous peoples have to say about the “Chinese dream”?
Ironically, Ko in January 2020 criticized China for terminating Shanghai’s sister city status with Prague, saying that China should not attempt to decide what friendly relationships Prague pursues. Ko seemingly failed to realize that Chinese pressure on Prague was designed to pressure Taiwan, to decide who Taiwan can be friends with. Is that how “family” treat each other?
China represents a legitimate threat to Taiwan, and not just militarily. In March last year, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuo Kuo-wen (郭國文) raised concern after Taiwanese junior-high school students were recognized by the Pingtan County Government in China’s Fujian Province for essays they wrote about “compatriot love.” The same county last month hosted youth events in a renewed bid to influence Taiwanese.
Chinese interactions with Taiwanese are held for the clear purpose of furthering the CCP’s “united front” objectives. The sooner Ko realizes this, the better.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS