On Thursday last week, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported that Air Force Commander General Hsiung Hou-chi (熊厚基) took part in a videoconference on military affairs in the Indo-Pacific region, citing the Indian Air Force’s Facebook page. This is encouraging news.
Indian Air Chief Marshal Vivek Ram Chaudhari and air force commanders in the region met online to discuss the challenges of distributed logistics and combat deployment while operating in austere locations.
Political and academic circles in India have been paying attention to the situation in the Taiwan Strait, and related issues are often covered in the Indian media. For example, Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa’s supportive remarks about Taiwan were made in an Indian interview.
INDIA’s PROGRAMS
Taiwan and India have French-made Mirage 2000-5 fighter jets and see China as their main enemy, so the two nations have shared interests to discuss in exchanges.
Coincidentally, they are also developing next-generation air forces.
The Indian Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program is developing a fifth-generation fighter jet for the country’s air force and navy. The AMCA is to be a twin-engine, all-weather and multi-functional stealth fighter jet.
When the program was launched, the aim was to have the fighter jet outperform the Mirage 2000 series. The Indian government allocated US$2 billion to the program for research and development, while private enterprises gave US$350 million in the initial stages.
In 2020, the AMCA was to undergo wind tunnel testing. India signed a memorandum of understanding with Russia to gain the technology for 3D thrust vectoring and active electronically scanned array antennas.
India is also working with UK-based Rolls-Royce to develop a new engine based on the Eurojet EJ200, a turbofan engine used in the Eurofighter Typhoon multirole fighter.
WORKING TOGETHER
If Taiwan could collaborate with India on next-generation indigenous fighter jet programs, it would be easier to obtain mature, stable technology from the international spot market.
To block Chinese expansion in the South China Sea, India helped the Philippines to set up three battalions outfitted with BrahMos ground-launched cruise missiles, while providing the Philippines with low-interest loans.
The US agreed to sell Taiwan the basic version of the Harpoon missile, which has a range of 148km and a speed of Mach 0.85 (1049.58kph), but India offered the Philippines a supersonic version with a range of 300km and a speed of Mach 3. India seems to be more generous than the US.
IN WITH A CHANCE
People often say that no one dares to sell weapons to Taiwan due to Chinese pressure, but that excuse does not stand up to the principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
Thanks to the government’s efforts over the past few years, Taiwan has found friendly countries in Europe, such as Lithuania and the Czech Republic.
It is heartening to see that Taiwan is now engaged in Indo-Pacific cooperation. Hopefully, it can enhance relations for deeper collaboration with India so that the two nations can fight back against the bully China together.
Chang Feng-lin is a university lecturer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS