After losing her son to COVID-19 last year, 79-year-old Tomasa Valdez was desperate to get vaccinated, but on the remote Philippine island of San Salvador, where she lives, there were no shots to be had.
Getting to the mainland, where vaccines were available, meant a boat ride that was arduous at her age, and expensive given Valdez’s meager income from drying sea grass, which she sells for less than 100 pesos (US$1.95) per sack. Help only arrived last month, 10 months after the Philippines began its national COVID-19 vaccination program, and about a year after Western nations such as the US and UK started theirs.
Even then, health workers had to travel via a wooden motorized boat, ferrying heavy vaccine storage equipment across the choppy South China Sea.
“Vaccines really have to be brought closer to the people, not the other way around,” said Noel Bueno, the doctor who inoculated Valdez.
While lack of supply was the biggest threat initially to the vaccination programs of developing nations, now it is logistics.
Places such as the Philippines are now struggling to get shots into the arms of their citizens, millions of whom live on distant archipelagos or far-flung mountaintops, under-served by roads, transport and basic infrastructure.
Developed countries are getting to the point where they are choosing to live with COVID-19 and treat it as endemic, as their hospital systems are insulated by higher vaccination rates. However, logistical issues continue to bedevil vaccine initiatives in poorer countries, becoming one of the world’s biggest public-health challenges as the pandemic enters its third year.
The Philippines has one of Asia’s lowest vaccination rates, with only about half of its population having received two shots, data show. Its limited and costly testing apparatus, fragmented tracing program and fragile health system have made it hard to stamp out outbreaks, despite several economically devastating lockdowns. The country has posted record daily case increases, potentially due to the spread of the contagious Omicron strain of SARS-CoV-2.
The hurdles that developing nations face in widening the reach of their inoculation programs — which can extend beyond logistics to issues of vaccine hesitancy and social media rumors — are likely to stymie global efforts to contain the virus. New strains can proliferate in under-vaccinated populations and lengthen the pandemic as the emergence and spread of the Delta and Omicron variants in India and Africa have shown.
Developing nations face a “combination of challenges in hard infrastructure in the form of trucks [and] freezers, but also soft infrastructure in the form of logistics staff, vaccine administrators and adequate planning,” said Prashant Yadav, a senior fellow at the Washington and London-based Center for Global Development, who specializes in supply chains. “But these are all surmountable barriers and we have managed to overcome them for the Ebola vaccine, and many other outbreak vaccines.”
While the US government and international agencies have begun efforts to support developing countries, more high-income countries need to step in, he said.
To help address these logistical woes, the US Agency for International Development pledged US$315 million for mobile vaccination sites for hard-to-reach rural areas, and to invest in cold-storage facilities.
For much of last year, developing nations faced difficulty getting access to the most effective vaccines, which were initially hoarded by Western countries for their own use. The Philippines first relied on shots from China’s Sinovac Biotech Ltd, which have been shown to be less potent than the mRNA shots being used in the US, particularly against the Omicron variant.
However, in the past few months, many of its supply problems have eased, and the Philippines now has a stockpile of shots. More mRNA vaccines from Pfizer Inc and Moderna Inc are now being administered in the Southeast Asian country, particularly to young people, but its logistical challenges have lingered.
Other low and middle-income nations are grappling with challenges of their own. In Asia, India is pushing to get shots to its vast, impoverished countryside, while Indonesia’s vaccine drive is hampered by the difficulty of reaching people spread across its thousands of islands.
In sub-Saharan Africa, poor trade and transport infrastructure could destroy vaccines and further derail the region’s already slow shot rollout, an African Development Bank report said last year.
“No journey is more critical to determining the fate of a pandemic than the distance a vaccine must travel from the production line to a person’s arm,” the report said.
Nations from Asia to Africa are attempting to get creative and stretch their limited budgets to bring vaccines to isolated areas. The government in Ghana partnered with a start-up to use drones to ferry tens of thousands of Pfizer-BioNTech shots to its remote countryside.
In Malawi, where less than 5 percent of the population is fully vaccinated, health workers drive vans from the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund to bring shots to remote rural areas.
In the Philippines, local officials in the central city of Tacloban are now dangling 100-peso transportation fares for those from remote areas who have to travel to get vaccinated, Vice Mayor Jerry Yaokasin said. The country is also pushing to expand vaccine coverage to boost a fragile economic recovery, with plans to set up more vaccination sites in pharmacies.
Despite delays, residents such as Valdez who live isolated areas are thankful for these efforts.
“I can finally walk along the shore to collect sea grass without having to worry about getting very sick from COVID,” she said, smiling as she finally held her vaccine card, more than two months after her son’s death.
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —