The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is floundering. Over its past two years of politicking, it has racked up a staggering number of losses on votes that it initiated. Two of its four recall drives failed, and each of the two that succeeded only served to add another Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) seat to the legislature. This is not to mention the slap in the face that was last month’s referendum, with all four of its proposals soundly defeated, despite the money and effort that the party put into them.
For all of its talk about upholding the duties of the opposition and “standing on the side of the people,” the KMT has lost sight of what this means after six years out of power.
As the KMT has itself proclaimed, the role of an opposition party is to hold the ruling party to account. In a perfect system, the opposition would scrutinize government proposals to improve them through free debate on behalf of the minority they represent. Drastic measures such as boycotts would be reserved for truly egregious oversteps as it fine-tuned its platform for the next election.
This is a far cry from reality. Instead of an opposition party, the KMT has fashioned itself into a party of opposition, reflexively opposing the DPP no matter the policy, even when it serves its own interests.
As the examples are nearly innumerable, why not focus on the most recent? On Thursday, KMT lawmakers abstained from participating in a public hearing of the Legislative Yuan’s Constitutional Amendment Committee to protest the DPP’s alleged contravention of procedure, claiming it was “faking the process to deceive the public.” It even went so far as to demand that the DPP take responsibility for the failure of the process, crudely admitting to its plan to tank the amendment and pin it on the DPP.
All of this was done to blockade a popular constitutional amendment that would lower the voting age to 18. Considering its aging voter base, this is the kind of policy that the party should get behind to foster good sentiment among younger demographics. With the right messaging, it could claim credit for the change and show young voters that the KMT is not just their grandparents’ party.
Instead, it has demeaned the youth vote as susceptible only to superficial pandering through KMT swag, terrible rap songs and now non-fungible tokens of party artifacts, as it hops on the digital-art bandwagon with a version of a sword that belonged to former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Even though the party has been burned by its contrarianism time and again, it will have a difficult time changing tack. As reflexive opposition is expected, any cooperation is perceived as a humiliating loss to hardcore KMT supporters.
The party felt this acutely over the weekend when it came under fire from Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) for supporting the resumption of food imports from Fukushima and four other Japanese prefectures, given that Tokyo can guarantee their safety.
There was nothing drastic about the statement released on Friday, yet it apparently made Jaw “almost faint.” He then proceeded to outline the corrupted version of opposition politics that has crippled the KMT, saying that it is the party’s duty as the opposition to present data to counter the DPP. In a perfect system, scientific data would escape politicization and all parties would draft policy based on evidence. Yet that does not mesh with the self-styled party of opposition.
The KMT knows it is floundering. If it continues to oppose everything without offering something to believe in, it will only consign itself to the past.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry