Reforming recall law
I am writing in response to the articles “Lim calls for a halt to further recalls” and “Lin thanks Taichung voters after victory” published by the Taipei Times (Jan. 11, page 3). Sunday’s voting results in Taipei and Taichung thankfully prove to be a positive trend toward electing and endorsing appropriate lawmakers to represent their constituents.
Many of us breathed a sigh of relief as independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐) survived his recall vote, and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-elect Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) successfully avenged the unceremonial unseating of Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s (TSP) Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) and retained the seat under a DPP-TSP alliance.
Disturbingly, there is still a very high proportion of voters in these electorates who still insist on voting against diligence, fairness, justice and equality from their elected representative.
After the series of recall and by-election votes since the last general elections in 2020, Taiwan’s electoral laws regarding recalls must be amended at the soonest opportunity to represent community expectations, and avoid being abused by those with ulterior motives.
The repercussions of continuous revenge recalls initiated by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or pan-blue affiliated groups and people since the successful recall vote against former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) have cumulatively cost Taiwanese taxpayers NT$1.8 billion (US$65.16 million), and cost legislators Wang Hao-yu (王浩宇) of the DPP and Chen their seats, while independent Lim and Kaohsiung City Councllor Huang Jie (黃捷) survived their recall votes.
Taxpayer funds should not be wasted in such a fashion to satisfy one’s twisted motives for political and financial gain. This makes a mockery of electoral laws and results of fair, transparent democratic elections.
Under the current law, the costs of initiating and staging a recall vote is not the responsibility of the initiating party, nor the person who initiates the motion. Those with ulterior motives that can affect the local political landscape can therefore use the recall law at their will to remove politicians they do not like, particularly from smaller parties and independents. This was amply demonstrated by Taichung’s Yen family, patriarch Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), serial sore loser Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恒) and their role in unseating Chen to protect their family’s business interests.
To protect taxpayer funds and maintain integrity, it would be highly advisable to level some proportion of financial and legal responsibility of such costs to the initiating party. In addition, there must be stiff penalties (financial or otherwise) for false recall alliance forms that are submitted to the Central Election Commission by the initiating party. A disproportionate amount of Chen and Lim’s recall alliance forms were proven to be falsified and even included forms filled by many who are no longer with us. This should not happen.
Finally, there must be a proportional amount of votes required to recall an incapacitated politician. I believe 25 percent of the most recent vote is far too low and does not represent an accurate voice of the constituency. While I feel at least 35 to 40 percent would be better, this must be debated in the legislature by elected representatives and legal experts to ensure a fair and reasonable amendment.
If these laws are not amended appropriately, dedicated, high-performing legislators like Chen will continue to fall due to political infighting between legislative factions.
With the fall of Kabul not yet six months past, Washington faces a fresh test of its ability to sustain Pax Americana, as more than 100,000 Russian troops, heavy artillery and tanks mass on Russia’s border with Ukraine. The mounting crisis looks set to become the greatest test of US President Joe Biden’s administration to date — the outcome of which could have far-reaching implications and send ripples through the Taiwan Strait. Moscow’s Ukraine gambit appears designed to probe the Biden administration — to ferret out its red lines and ascertain whether Washington is willing to commit troops to defend its
The start of any new year is always a good time for introspection, reflection and resolutions. This advice is appropriate for all. In Taiwan, it should clearly be heeded by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which continues to have its share of troubles. The KMT has had so many difficulties in the past decade that it almost seems to revel in them with the celebration of each new year. What then could be done? The KMT can begin by examining the present and slowly tracing backward to see how the dots are connected. Whether the party admits it or not, it
Last year, China entered into a spat with Lithuania over Vilnius allowing Taipei to open a de facto embassy using the name “Taiwan.” Beijing recalled its ambassadors from Lithuania and downgraded its diplomatic ties with the Baltic state to the “charge d’affaires” level. In hindsight, China should realize that this move handed Lithuania on a plate to Taiwan. China used its economic leverage as punishment. First, it tried to pressure German industry giant Continental AG to stop using Lithuanian-made components. When an EU trade commissioner said that Chinese customs were refusing to clear goods containing Lithuanian parts, China denied it was at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is floundering. Over its past two years of politicking, it has racked up a staggering number of losses on votes that it initiated. Two of its four recall drives failed, and each of the two that succeeded only served to add another Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) seat to the legislature. This is not to mention the slap in the face that was last month’s referendum, with all four of its proposals soundly defeated, despite the money and effort that the party put into them. For all of its talk about upholding the duties of the opposition