A new year has started, bringing new aspirations for the months ahead. As people consider their personal resolutions, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) outlined those she envisions for the nation in her New Year’s Day address on Saturday.
Taiwan, in these early days of the year, finds itself in an enviable position. Economic growth last year likely reached an 11-year high, as the nation rocketed back into the ranks of the top 20 world economies. People were able to gather in the drizzle to watch the Taipei 101 fireworks even as a new Omicron-led wave of the COVID-19 pandemic surges across the globe.
Yet obstacles will of course arise, even if the world hopes for the resumption of normalcy after two challenging years.
In Tsai’s view, the main issues facing Taiwan are inflation, property prices and the potential of another outbreak. While the first two issues received much of the president’s attention in her speech, the third was conspicuously absent. Compared with last year’s address, when Tsai praised at length the successful COVID-19 policies that allowed a “normal lifestyle” to continue, little was mentioned beyond the “several months made particularly turbulent by the pandemic.”
Where some might have been seeking an indication that Taiwan is preparing to open up, there was little hope to be found. “COVID-zero” has been and remains an attractive domestic policy, especially with local elections scheduled at the end of the year, and as the economy surges onward little deterred and Omicron uncertainties abound.
People remain more concerned about other issues, foremost among them inflation, housing and social support. Tsai was ready to assuage these fears, dedicating ample time in her speech to touting price controls, wage increases, social housing progress, rent subsidies and support for families.
While she mentioned many of these policies last year as well, they did not take as much of the focus, indicating that after two years of COVID-19 dominating the airwaves, Tsai and her Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) appear poised to shift their rhetoric toward other issues.
These were summarized in Tsai’s “four pillars for stable governance” this year, which apart from strengthening the social security network, also include continuing global engagement, maintaining economic momentum and safeguarding national sovereignty.
Making progress in the Taiwan-US Trade and Investment Framework Agreement and joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership received specific mentions, as did deepening New Southbound Policy cooperation and European ties on the heels of a good year for bilateral engagement.
However, most international headlines focused on Tsai’s emphasis on peace in the Taiwan Strait, a slight change from last year’s accusations of Chinese destabilization and appeals for dialogue. This tonal shift is not unprecedented, considering rising concern over the past year that conflict is more likely than ever. However, she also refrained from using the term “Republic of China” in favor of “Taiwan,” which has not gone unnoticed.
Yet if anything should set the tone for this year, it is Tsai’s assertion of Taiwan’s democratic credentials at the top of her address. Praising last month’s referendum as a mark of a mature civil society, she emphasized that “when we come together and have faith in our democratic institutions, Taiwan can overcome any challenge.”
This was likely a veiled response to dangerous Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) accusations that the DPP has a totalitarian grip over Taiwan. Yet maintaining faith in the democratic process remains more important than ever, especially as local elections and constitutional reform take the stage, not to mention the real authoritarian threat looming across the Strait.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS