Local manufacturers, especially those in the supply chains of Apple and Google, are seeking new and better ways to offset carbon emissions to comply with stricter regulations on air pollutants. Some companies have set goals to reach net-zero emissions by 2035 or 2050, as the emissions issue is quickly evolving into a trade barrier.
Companies have adopted different approaches to conserve energy and reduce their carbon footprint, such as constructing smart buildings and using lights-out manufacturing, or planting trees to offset carbon emissions. LCD panel suppliers and hardware makers have sought to reduce emissions by streamlining product designs and using fewer components. In the past few years, several companies have signed green energy purchase agreements with private electricity suppliers as part of efforts to fight climate change.
However, those measures have had a limited effect on capturing carbon already released into the atmosphere.
Sinyi Realty’s latest project is turning an island off Malaysia’s Sabah state into a zero-emission summer resort, company founder Chou Chun-chi (周俊吉) told the Chinese-language Business Weekly and CommonWealth Magazine last month. Although the island, which Sinyi bought in 2019 for NT$1.4 billion (US$50.5 million at the current exchange rate), has the capacity for 10 hotels, the developer plans to build only two.
An environmental conservation team was established to plant trees and create environments friendly to algae, coral, seagrass and wetlands plants, Chou said, adding that a sea turtle conservation center would also be created. The island would play a crucial role in the company’s efforts to reach its goal to become carbon neutral by 2030, he said.
Following Sinyi’s move, some local manufacturers have begun scouting for similar areas to capture carbon, as they plan ahead for the coming carbon credit trade. Sinyi is one of few local businesses that have been exploring innovative ways to fight climate change, while most companies are beginners in the field. Many have resorted to buying renewable energy to offset carbon emissions.
For smaller companies, the scarcity of green energy is a major obstacle on the road to reach carbon neutrality. Solar panel installations have lagged behind the government’s expectations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and bureaucracy. By the end of the year, Taiwan’s installed solar energy capacity is expected to reach 7 gigawatts (GW), less than half of the government’s 20GW target by 2025. Most wind energy, generated mostly by offshore wind farms, would not be available until 2025.
Large companies are better prepared and have more resources to address climate change to overcome requirements that businesses achieve certain levels of carbon emissions. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker and a major supplier to Apple, has secured 99 percent of green energy certificates available since the nation’s first green energy trading platform was created last year. The certificates bought by TSMC can be translated into about 600 million units of green power. The chipmaker on Thursday secured 1GW of wind power by signing an agreement with Wpd Taiwan Energy. That is equivalent to about 3.7 billion units of green energy, allowing TSMC to reduce carbon emissions by 1.85 million tonnes per year.
As most local manufacturers are small and medium-sized businesses, they do not have the resources and knowledge to source green energy or carbon credits, not to mention any measures to cope with an imminent carbon border tax by the EU. The government should help them tackle the issue by providing more incentives to promote using green energy and accelerate the formation of a carbon credit trading mechanism.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s