The lifting of a ban on the importation of pork containing traces of ractopamine will help Taiwan set up international trade partnerships.
Now that the referendum chaos is left behind, the ban will not be reinstated. Taiwanese voters turned their backs on mindless populism in favor of rationality, demonstrated exceptional maturity, and acted as an impressive check and balance on the political process.
Three years ago, Taiwanese who were opposed to the importation of food products from northeastern Japan started labeling them “nuclear foods” and pushed for the world’s first and only “anti-nuclear food referendum.”
The governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) did not challenge the referendum question head-on, and voters took fright at the word “nuclear.” The referendum question, put to a vote alongside a slew of other questions in the chaotic 2018 nine-in-one elections, passed.
The 2011 earthquake and tsunami that triggered the Fukushima nuclear disaster was a national trauma for Japan, and Taiwan’s unexpected move was akin to rubbing salt in its wounds.
Taiwan-friendly then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe refrained from commenting on the situation, leaving this to then-Japanese minister of foreign affairs Taro Kono, and did not take any retributive actions toward Taiwan.
Japan has since had a change of leadership. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is a member of the influential Kochikai faction of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has had ties with China for six decades.
Ahead of the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties between Japan and China in September next year, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) gave Kishida a congratulatory telephone call after he was elected prime minister.
Kishida also conformed to China’s expectations by designating the China-friendly Yoshimasa Hayashi as minister for foreign affairs — an olive branch toward China.
The Japanese House of Councilors election is scheduled for July next year. Considering the strong anti-China sentiment among Japanese, the Kishida administration would not dare blatantly go against the will of the public. Taiwan and US-friendly members of the party have been pressuring Kishida to clarify the LDP’s stance on Taiwan-US-China policy.
Kishida has voiced support for Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Assembly and its bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
If Taiwan can take this opportunity to lift the ban on Japanese food imports from areas affected by the nuclear disaster as a sign of good faith, not only would it look good for both Kishida and Taiwan-friendly members of his party, it might also bring solace to the victims of the 2011 events. Why not push for a policy that can kill two birds with one stone?
The successful 2018 referendum — on imposing a blanket ban on the importation of food and agricultural products from Fukushima, Ibaraki, Gunma, Tochigi and Chiba prefectures — at the time dashed Taiwan’s hopes of joining the CPTPP.
None of the CPTPP members have diplomatic ties with Taipei, so if Taiwan wishes to join, it needs the US and Japan as mediators.
Had the pork import ban referendum — promoted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — succeeded, it would have offended the US. Taiwanese rejected that.
If the KMT also continues to provoke Japan, there will be little hope for the party of ever returning to power.
As for the 2018 referendum, Taiwanese said “no” to radioactive contamination in foods, not all foods from northeastern Japan.
The KMT’s opposition for opposition’s sake is likely to fade away. When the nation was facing a shortage of COVID-19 vaccines, and a Chinese import ban on pineapples and wax apples, Japan stood by Taiwan.
It is high time to return the favor and lift the ban on Japanese food imports.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisai Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan.
Translated by Rita Wang
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent