The loss of diplomatic relations with Nicaragua is undeniably a blow to Taiwan.
Taiwanese have expressed widespread outrage at the Chinese Communist Party’s repeated poaching of the nation’s diplomatic allies, and there has been unity across its major political parties in condemning the action.
However, there has also been a tempting yet misguided stance that some expressed over the loss: that Nicaragua, as an unfree, undemocratic and underdeveloped country, was an ally that Taiwan could afford to lose, or even that Taiwan does not need traditional diplomatic relations at all. This could not be further from the truth and ignores the difference between values-based diplomacy and national interest.
Regardless of the number of diplomatic relationships it enjoys, in terms of values, Taiwan stands as a beacon of freedom in Asia: Taiwan scored 94 out of 100 in a Freedom House ranking. Does this mean that Taiwan should only pursue relations with countries that have an equally high freedom ranking? Of course not.
Among Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, Eswatini, scoring 19 out of 100; Haiti, scoring 37; Honduras, scoring 44; Guatemala, scoring 52; and Paraguay, scoring 65, are not considered “free” by Freedom House standards, but they maintain diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
This shows that holding similar political ideals is not necessary to maintain diplomatic relations.
This is not just a phenomenon exhibited by Taiwan: The US and Japan, which have similar government philosophies, maintain diplomatic relations with China, a country with whom they have sharp political disagreements. Likewise, non-democratic countries have strong relations with democratic countries that disparage their governments.
The reason is that a savvy nation will not make its decisions purely on the basis of values, lest it eventually lose the power to decide altogether. Nations must act in their own interests. Often, this means supporting political allies. Other times, it means trading with nations that do not share your values.
That is not to say that Taiwan should disregard the quality of a nation’s government while interacting with it.
The poor human rights record of the administration of Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega is a disservice to his country and even a stain on Taiwan’s international reputation, but in the long term, it would have been positive to maintain these relations.
Taiwan should not simply write off Nicaragua, as maintaining friendly exchanges between citizens and the business community would help develop Taiwan’s soft power and also help it rekindle these relations.
Taiwan strives to build relationships that are resilient enough to continue to thrive in spite of political turbulence.
The difference between a “person” and a “citizen” partially resides in the fact that a person exists in the natural world and a citizen is created in the social world — states follow a similar pattern.
Taiwan exists as a de facto state, but without the social recognition of other nations, it lacks some of the autonomy other states have to participate in international organizations. To get that recognition, Taiwan must increase its visibility, which requires providing value. That means participating meaningfully in as many international organizations as possible and maintaining its non-diplomatic relations diligently.
Taiwan can look attractive to allies by contributing to their national interest — which can be done through trade, technological and security cooperation.
The Lowy Institute ranks Taiwan as the 14th-most powerful country out of 26 on its Asia Power Index, but points out that Taiwan’s score might be skewed due to its uncertain diplomatic status. Based on economics alone, it ranks Taiwan as eighth in Asia and says that the nation is becoming more competitive. Taiwan should leverage this position of relative power to contribute to the economic, social and political development of its neighbors.
Outreach could partially take the form of providing technologies that improve economic stability, such as modified crops, or helping to train the next generation of engineers or Mandarin-speaking diplomats.
Taiwan’s national interest requires it to find new markets and increase its visibility, but its values, particularly the sanctity of the individual and self-government, might also be best served by pursuing these interests.
Taiwan’s contributions can help liberalize countries by stimulating grassroots economic development, as the nation has an abundance of cultural, technological and social capital to draw from. It should use that capital generously with the aim to develop its international visibility, respect and recognition.
Taiwan has the duty and necessity to engage with all potential allies, be they liberal or illiberal, developed or underdeveloped. It is a massive mistake in the battle for international visibility, respect and recognition to play the role of a shunned child or lover who pretends that “they did not want to play together anyway.”
Taiwan must always take the high road, but never a high horse when engaging with the international community.
Chen Kuan-ting is chief executive officer of the Taiwan Nextgen Foundation and a former staff member at the National Security Council.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS