The reports of Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kao Chia-yu (高嘉瑜) being physically abused by her then-partner shocked the nation. Many older viewers in front of the television might be wondering: “What’s wrong with the love lives of young people nowadays?” Younger viewers might be wondering: “Can love ever be trusted again?”
Taiwan’s cosmopolitan values are greatly influenced by the Western media. These influences have borne plenty of fruit in the realm of social justice and in the battle for gender equality, which has gotten the nation noticed on the international stage.
With the rise of the “Internet generation,” who came of age during Taiwan’s era of cosmopolitan values, Taiwan has broken with many traditional viewpoints over the past decade, especially regarding marriage and young people.
Young couples increasingly choose to “live together,” without the intention of marrying. This new “norm” has not come up with a definitive answer for the question of “Where does love lead to eventually?” In an era that values individualism, can the freedom of living as a single person with romantic partners sustain Taiwan as a community?
Many young people, like me, might question the need to marry, given Taiwan’s high cost of living and the family issues that accompany marriage.
However, fewer people seem to have thought deeply about or questioned the purpose of “not marrying.”
The Western concept of marriage is rooted in long-standing Christian values. Catholics call it “holy matrimony” to signify the value that they place on marriage, but with the decline of Christianity among the younger generation, views on marriage have also seen rapid change.
If we take a look outside Taiwan, New Zealand is perhaps the most liberal Anglophone country when it comes to legalizing “partnerships” of same or opposite-sex couples without the need for marriage. According to the government Web portal Stats NZ, romantic relationships outside of marriage have not shown a decrease in legal separations or domestic abuse.
This is an era when marriage is no longer a relationship of unbreakable “holy ground.” As that Taiwanese saying goes: “A happy marriage is 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.” Two people must give up a big part of themselves to unify as one in a relationship.
Committing to a partnership outside the obligation of marriage seems to be a good way to “pick and choose” what best suits each partner. In an age of individualism, this can do no harm.
Downplaying the necessity of marriage in adult life is a new experience in Taiwanese society. Psychological studies have shown that being in a stable relationship with an intimate partner can maximize well-being in older age. In an era when marriage has become nothing more than a signed legal document, people should ask themselves: Can partnerships replace marriage as what sustains a liberalized Taiwanese society, given the complex reality of human nature?
Ichen Sun is a musician and researcher at the University of Auckland.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS