The US government has invited Taiwan and 110 other countries, including many in the EU, to take part in an online Summit for Democracy on Thursday and Friday.
A US Department of State spokesperson in October said that Taiwan could make meaningful commitments to the aims of the summit — defending against authoritarianism, fighting corruption and promoting human rights.
The spokesperson cited the high ranking awarded Taiwan by Transparency International, and praised the country for its use of emerging technologies to make governments more transparent and responsive to the public mood.
Taiwan has for more than a decade ranked about 30th out of the 180 countries and regions listed in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI), and for the past two years it has advanced to 28th place. It has also achieved passing scores throughout this period.
Among the East Asian countries that have not been invited to the Summit for Democracy, such as China, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia, all except for Singapore scored below 40 out of 100 in the CPI and ranked lower than 80th place.
Transparency International’s CPI is based on data collected from 13 highly respected international organizations such as the UK’s Economist Intelligence Unit and Switzerland’s Institute for Management Development. The information is processed through a secondary data analysis, followed by systematic and scientific scoring and ranking.
After more than 20 years, the CPI enjoys considerable international credibility and is highly regarded by national governments. It is for good reason that the State Department used this index as a reference for selecting which countries to invite to the summit.
In 2010, Taiwan established the Agency Against Corruption, which combined the pre-existing government ethics and investigative systems to establish a sound and comprehensive system for anti-corruption education, prevention and investigation.
Although Taiwan is not a UN member state, it has instituted the Act to Implement the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (聯合國反貪腐公約施行法), and it adheres to the provisions of the convention. Taiwan has gained international recognition for its concerted efforts in this regard.
The chairperson of Transparency International has been invited to give a presentation at the summit on Thursday. There is to be a forum to discuss how corruption hurts democracy, which is expected to issue a joint declaration against corruption.
It is good to see how seriously democratic countries are taking the issue of corruption, and Taipei is no doubt happy to share with other countries its experience in using new technologies to make governments more transparent.
However, the nation must not be complacent about its achievements with regard to clean government, but rather strive to do even better.
For example, two years ago the Ministry of Justice invited international experts to review Taiwan’s achievements in implementing the UN Convention Against Corruption. The experts recommended that Taiwan should institute a “whistle-blower protection act” and strengthen anti-corruption awareness and regulations in the private sector, but no progress has been made on these proposals.
Hopefully, the Legislative Yuan and government ethics agencies can act a bit faster to further enhance Taiwan’s achievements in democracy and clean government.
Hsu Jen-hui is chair of Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS