Now that the Legislative Yuan has passed the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act (跟蹤騷擾防制法), to be put into effect six months after it is approved by the president, there will finally be a legal basis and a mechanism for dealing with people engaged in long-term stalking behavior.
The problem is that the definition of stalking is too vague, and this creates difficulty in enforcing the law.
In the legislation, so long as a suspected stalker does not enter private property and has not made any verbal or physical threats, the person being stalked can only ask the police to intervene based on the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法).
If the stalker does not desist from the behavior, they can only be fined less than NT$3,000 or be admonished, which have limited preventive effects.
Also, the legislation allowing for a court-issued restraining order only applies to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (家庭暴力防治法). If the alleged stalker and the person being stalked are not related or living at the same address, a restraining order cannot be issued.
The enforcement agencies are therefore unable to intervene unless the stalker assaults the victim, a state of affairs that is a farce.
The stalking and harassment prevention legislation would criminalize stalking behavior, and the offender could be imprisoned for up to three years, or up to five years if the offender is carrying a weapon.
By the principle of prosecution as last resort, stalking behavior would not result in a trial without a complaint being filed, respecting the wishes of the stalking victim, and prosecutors would only be able to apply for pre-emptive detention after criminal charges are pressed.
As soon as the stalking victim reports the behavior, the police are obligated to investigate the matter.
If the complaint is valid, the police would be required to give the stalker a formal warning in writing. If the stalker fails to comply over a period of two years, the victim could ask a court to issue a protective restraining order.
If the stalker then contravenes this restraining order and continues the behavior, they could receive a sentence of up to three years.
On paper, the new law appears to be sufficient to curtail stalking behavior. Unfortunately, it would only be effective if the police are able in the first instance to accurately identify the alleged stalking behavior.
Article 3, paragraph 1 of the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act attempts to define what stalking behavior is to prevent any ambiguity, listing eight types of behaviors. The trouble is that despite the ample examples given, the duplication and crossover between the listed behaviors and their inherent ambiguity — such as the differences between undue surveillance and monitoring, threatening and insulting, or stalking and tailing — make the definitions of stalking itself difficult to pin down.
In an attempt to prevent this list from getting out of hand, the law requires that acts of harassment be against the will of the victim and be related to sex or gender, in addition to the requirement that the behavior in question leads to fear or intimidation.
Unfortunately, the requirement of behavior consisting of sexual or gender-related assault is open to much legal interpretation, and it could lead to concerns over arbitrary judgements being made.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate law professor at Aletheia University and the director of the university’s Research Center for Criminal Law.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.