The Taipei City Government has established the nation’s first senior citizens’ job center in Nangang District (南港).
Helping senior citizens find work is a trend that has found a foothold in the US, Europe and Japan.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) got the ball rolling in Taiwan, hoping that the central government and local governments would build on Taipei’s effort to create a new economy in which younger and older people alike can contribute.
A primary reason that helping older people get back to work is becoming popular in advanced economies is that life expectancy continues to rise faster than retirement ages are increasing, and in some cases people are forced to retire earlier than they want, with the result that many retirees are keen to take up another employment.
Another reason lies in changes in social, population and family structures. Rapid developments in artificial intelligence and information technology widen the generational digital divide on the one hand, but on the other open a space for interplay of modern technology and the experience those who have honed their craft over many years.
Over the past five years, the number of older people going back to work in the US, the EU and Japan has increased by 30 percent. Seniors often say that being 70 years old is no longer too old to work.
The 93-year-old Japanese Yoshimitsu Yabuta is a perfect example. Yabuta started a part-time job at a McDonald’s branch in Takaoka City in 2019, when he was 90, working the evening shift four days a week, and said that he finds pleasure in his new job.
Older people in the US and Japan are for the most part looking for work in fast-food restaurants, beverage outlets and convenience stores, and many also work part-time for civic groups that help disadvantaged members of their communities.
A small number of older people with backgrounds in management or technology are also becoming consultants for industry associations or corporations.
In my experience teaching in northern Europe, finding employment provides older people with a greater sense of worth, above and beyond the extra income. And more importantly, their contribution also helps the national economy and aids industrial development.
Young people in the prime of their lives are not satisfied with running chain coffee shops, beverage outlets or restaurants. These are jobs better filled by older people, allowing the younger generation to seek employment in jobs where their skills can be put to better use, such as in the technology sector.
Taiwan is falling behind in this area. With the rate of older people looking for work at only 6.7 percent, there is significant room for growth.
The advent of intergenerational housing also shows why seniors are seeking employment.
The problem with housing strictly for older people is that it lacks intergenerational exchange and creates a socially limiting living environment.
When seniors go back to work in their communities and live in the same buildings as younger people, different generations can interact and look after each other, energizing every community member.
Governments in advanced nations are looking for ways to renovate housing predominantly occupied by older people to make it more attractive for young renters, as well as to build social housing suitable for older occupants.
In Taiwan, mixed housing projects could efficiently and quickly address the problem of scarce housing for younger people, and the government should look into this idea.
At a time when soaring property prices are making it difficult for young people to get married and settle down, and when it is difficult for them to make ends meet and raise a family, encouraging older people to return to work would have multiple benefits.
Instead of just making spurious promises of addressing housing justice that it cannot keep, government agencies in Taiwan should change tack and implement these ideas.
Andrew Huang is president of the Taiwan Association of Public Interest.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS