Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took a big gamble shaking up key industries ahead of a political gathering that could decide whether he rules the country indefinitely. Now he is starting to hit the brakes.
In the past few weeks Chinese authorities have moved to soften sweeping policies designed to make the economy less dependent on debt, monopolies and fossil fuels.
While Beijing’s edicts chastened China’s corporate elites, they also began showing signs of hitting ordinary citizens with higher power bills, lost savings and — if the economy continues to struggle — potentially fewer jobs.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) expressed caution a week ago, saying that China needed to rethink the pace of the country’s energy transition as a power crisis threatened to keep factories in the dark and homes without heat during the winter.
By Friday last week the People’s Bank of China finally spoke on the debt crisis at China Evergrande Group, saying that the risks were “controllable” and lenders should keep credit to the real-estate sector “stable and orderly.”
That came shortly after Bloomberg reported that financial regulators told some major banks to accelerate approval of mortgages in the last quarter.
“China is confronting now a confluence of rising structural economic headwinds,” said George Magnus, a research associate at Oxford University’s China Centre. “Stability and order will be craved above all things, but within the context of a very defined political agenda. The [Chinese Communist] Party [CCP] cannot afford to have anything like Evergrande or inflation go off the rails.”
The pullback shows the difficult balancing act Xi faces in overhauling the world’s second-biggest economy in a way that does not cause too much pain for the nation’s 1.4 billion people, about 40 percent of whom earn just 1,000 yuan (US$155) per month on average.
Xi’s push for “common prosperity” has underpinned a slew of policies aimed at tackling widening inequality, which poses a long-term threat to the legitimacy of the CPP — and ultimately his own political future.
While it is important for Xi to assert his authority ahead of next month’s plenum and next year’s CCP Congress — a twice-a-decade leadership reshuffle at which he is expected to secure a precedent-breaking third term — any economic downturn that leads to social unrest risks weakening his grip on power. Slowing the pace of change in key areas would allow Xi to ease immediate pressure without altering his broader plans to remake China’s economy.
“Xi has a low tolerance for outcomes that directly cause a lot of ordinary Chinese to suffer, because that would create serious risks to political stability and party legitimacy,” said Neil Thomas, Eurasia Group’s analyst for China and Northeast Asia. “The key stakeholder that Xi is determined to protect above all others is the Communist Party itself.”
The severity of China’s energy crisis and property slowdown has surprised economists, prompting many to downgrade their full-year economic growth forecasts.
Third-quarter figures released on Monday showed the challenge: GDP expanded 4.9 percent from a year earlier, down from a previously reported 7.9 percent in the preceding quarter. China’s stock benchmark CSI 300, one of Asia’s worst performers this year, fell about 1.2 percent.
While Chinese policymakers have expressed confidence they can hit modest growth targets and have not signaled plans for stimulus, authorities have recently struggled to calibrate their approach.
Last month Bank of America economists Miao Ouyang (歐陽淼) and Helen Qiao (喬虹) warned that the credit crunch was “unnecessarily aggressive” and would work against “the policy goal of a healthy and stable property market.”
At a virtual roundtable last week on the power crisis, representatives from European businesses in China said their factory managers received late-night text messages from government officials demanding they halt production the next day.
Local authorities, they said, could not differentiate between companies based on their energy use, instead taking a rigid one-size-fits-all approach largely out of fear of angering Beijing.
At the same time, top leaders did act quickly to ease price controls on the sector that had been in place for years in a bid to ease the crisis, which was stoked by a combination of rising global commodity prices and overzealous local officials seeking to hit emission-reduction targets.
The Chinese State Council this month announced that China would raise maximum electricity rates and gradually allow all coal-fired power to be traded on the open market.
In some ways, the start-stop nature of Xi’s reform push is a built-in feature. The CPP’s Qiushi Journal (求是) on Friday last week published a more complete version of one of Xi’s speeches in August, which emphasized the need for “gradual and orderly progress” in achieving “common prosperity.”
“It is impossible to achieve overnight,” Xi said.
The goal was ultimately to ensure social harmony through growing the middle class and reducing the proportion of rich and poor “to form an olive-shaped distribution structure,” he said.
He called for a stronger public sector and improved social-safety net while also emphasizing the need for upward mobility and mobilizing “the enthusiasm of entrepreneurs.”
At one point Xi acknowledged that China still has not figured out how exactly that will work.
“We have a complete solution to the problem of poverty, but we still have to explore and accumulate experience in the issue of how to get rich,” he said.
One key aspect to Xi’s plan involves strengthening patriotism, seen most clearly by China’s moves to press its claims on Taiwan. Chinese warplanes conducted a record number of sorties near Taiwan proper earlier this month, leading the US to denounce Beijing for “provocative military activity.”
At the same time, China is dialing down tensions with the US and its allies. Beijing had a relatively muted response to reports that a small number of US military advisers were deployed to Taiwan, and Xi agreed to a virtual summit later this year with US President Joe Biden. The Chinese leader last week also set up a summit with the EU later this year.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc recently won approval to take 100 percent ownership of its securities joint venture in China, and Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao (王文濤) on Monday told state broadcaster China Central Television that the government will keep expanding market access for foreign capital.
While China’s use of nationalism shows it needs a “non-economic means of trying to promote regime legitimacy,” right now Xi is focused on getting the economy stabilized, said Matthew Gertken, a geopolitical strategist at Montreal-based BCA Research, which provides global macro research.
“On the current trajectory there is a clear and present danger of widening illiquidity, collapsing property prices, credit crunch, financial and economic crisis, and sociopolitical problems,” Gertken said. “These outcomes may ultimately be unavoidable, but first the regime will moderate policy to try to avoid them.”
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS