Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took a big gamble shaking up key industries ahead of a political gathering that could decide whether he rules the country indefinitely. Now he is starting to hit the brakes.
In the past few weeks Chinese authorities have moved to soften sweeping policies designed to make the economy less dependent on debt, monopolies and fossil fuels.
While Beijing’s edicts chastened China’s corporate elites, they also began showing signs of hitting ordinary citizens with higher power bills, lost savings and — if the economy continues to struggle — potentially fewer jobs.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) expressed caution a week ago, saying that China needed to rethink the pace of the country’s energy transition as a power crisis threatened to keep factories in the dark and homes without heat during the winter.
By Friday last week the People’s Bank of China finally spoke on the debt crisis at China Evergrande Group, saying that the risks were “controllable” and lenders should keep credit to the real-estate sector “stable and orderly.”
That came shortly after Bloomberg reported that financial regulators told some major banks to accelerate approval of mortgages in the last quarter.
“China is confronting now a confluence of rising structural economic headwinds,” said George Magnus, a research associate at Oxford University’s China Centre. “Stability and order will be craved above all things, but within the context of a very defined political agenda. The [Chinese Communist] Party [CCP] cannot afford to have anything like Evergrande or inflation go off the rails.”
The pullback shows the difficult balancing act Xi faces in overhauling the world’s second-biggest economy in a way that does not cause too much pain for the nation’s 1.4 billion people, about 40 percent of whom earn just 1,000 yuan (US$155) per month on average.
Xi’s push for “common prosperity” has underpinned a slew of policies aimed at tackling widening inequality, which poses a long-term threat to the legitimacy of the CPP — and ultimately his own political future.
While it is important for Xi to assert his authority ahead of next month’s plenum and next year’s CCP Congress — a twice-a-decade leadership reshuffle at which he is expected to secure a precedent-breaking third term — any economic downturn that leads to social unrest risks weakening his grip on power. Slowing the pace of change in key areas would allow Xi to ease immediate pressure without altering his broader plans to remake China’s economy.
“Xi has a low tolerance for outcomes that directly cause a lot of ordinary Chinese to suffer, because that would create serious risks to political stability and party legitimacy,” said Neil Thomas, Eurasia Group’s analyst for China and Northeast Asia. “The key stakeholder that Xi is determined to protect above all others is the Communist Party itself.”
The severity of China’s energy crisis and property slowdown has surprised economists, prompting many to downgrade their full-year economic growth forecasts.
Third-quarter figures released on Monday showed the challenge: GDP expanded 4.9 percent from a year earlier, down from a previously reported 7.9 percent in the preceding quarter. China’s stock benchmark CSI 300, one of Asia’s worst performers this year, fell about 1.2 percent.
While Chinese policymakers have expressed confidence they can hit modest growth targets and have not signaled plans for stimulus, authorities have recently struggled to calibrate their approach.
Last month Bank of America economists Miao Ouyang (歐陽淼) and Helen Qiao (喬虹) warned that the credit crunch was “unnecessarily aggressive” and would work against “the policy goal of a healthy and stable property market.”
At a virtual roundtable last week on the power crisis, representatives from European businesses in China said their factory managers received late-night text messages from government officials demanding they halt production the next day.
Local authorities, they said, could not differentiate between companies based on their energy use, instead taking a rigid one-size-fits-all approach largely out of fear of angering Beijing.
At the same time, top leaders did act quickly to ease price controls on the sector that had been in place for years in a bid to ease the crisis, which was stoked by a combination of rising global commodity prices and overzealous local officials seeking to hit emission-reduction targets.
The Chinese State Council this month announced that China would raise maximum electricity rates and gradually allow all coal-fired power to be traded on the open market.
In some ways, the start-stop nature of Xi’s reform push is a built-in feature. The CPP’s Qiushi Journal (求是) on Friday last week published a more complete version of one of Xi’s speeches in August, which emphasized the need for “gradual and orderly progress” in achieving “common prosperity.”
“It is impossible to achieve overnight,” Xi said.
The goal was ultimately to ensure social harmony through growing the middle class and reducing the proportion of rich and poor “to form an olive-shaped distribution structure,” he said.
He called for a stronger public sector and improved social-safety net while also emphasizing the need for upward mobility and mobilizing “the enthusiasm of entrepreneurs.”
At one point Xi acknowledged that China still has not figured out how exactly that will work.
“We have a complete solution to the problem of poverty, but we still have to explore and accumulate experience in the issue of how to get rich,” he said.
One key aspect to Xi’s plan involves strengthening patriotism, seen most clearly by China’s moves to press its claims on Taiwan. Chinese warplanes conducted a record number of sorties near Taiwan proper earlier this month, leading the US to denounce Beijing for “provocative military activity.”
At the same time, China is dialing down tensions with the US and its allies. Beijing had a relatively muted response to reports that a small number of US military advisers were deployed to Taiwan, and Xi agreed to a virtual summit later this year with US President Joe Biden. The Chinese leader last week also set up a summit with the EU later this year.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc recently won approval to take 100 percent ownership of its securities joint venture in China, and Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao (王文濤) on Monday told state broadcaster China Central Television that the government will keep expanding market access for foreign capital.
While China’s use of nationalism shows it needs a “non-economic means of trying to promote regime legitimacy,” right now Xi is focused on getting the economy stabilized, said Matthew Gertken, a geopolitical strategist at Montreal-based BCA Research, which provides global macro research.
“On the current trajectory there is a clear and present danger of widening illiquidity, collapsing property prices, credit crunch, financial and economic crisis, and sociopolitical problems,” Gertken said. “These outcomes may ultimately be unavoidable, but first the regime will moderate policy to try to avoid them.”
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS