Education long game
Regarding the editorial about Harvard’s decision to relocate its summer language program from Beijing to Taipei (“Learning thrives where it is free,” Oct. 16, page 8), it is hard to overestimate the potential long-term positive impact actions like that will have on US-Taiwan relations. It is imperative that the government finds ways to convince more US universities to follow suit.
One only has to look at the history of the old Sanford Center, a consortium of a half-dozen leading US universities with significant Chinese studies and language programs that operated at National Taiwan University between 1963 and 1997.
Dozens of students from those schools spent a year in intensive advanced Chinese-language study at “Tai Da,” spending four hours a day in classes and the other hours studying, exploring the city and otherwise being exposed to the country and the people — and in most cases getting to love both.
Significantly, many of those students after graduation became government policymakers, academics, journalists and other professionals who were often instrumental in forming and maintaining US policy toward China and Taiwan.
It is hard to think of any of them who became detractors of Taiwan or doubters of Taiwan’s right to exist as an independent entity.
That in the face of the fact that many, if not most, held jaundiced views of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) era of martial law terror.
While there were other language training centers in Taipei after Stanford left, it was the most prestigious and important.
It is hard to know just how the Stanford Center’s move to Beijing affected US policy toward Taiwan, but it could not have been positive.
However, with the chilling of US-China relations, the increasing authoritarianism of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) regime in Beijing, and the Chinese Communist Party’s crushing of freedom in Hong Kong, there is a great opportunity for the leaders in Taipei to make an all-out effort to get other US institutions to follow Harvard’s example.
It might not make a tangible difference now, but in 10, 20 or 30 years, when the graduates have top positions in their crucial fields, it will be clearly evident.
We tend to cherish the wonderful experiences we had when we were younger.
I know that I did (class of 1969).
Charles Snyder
Retired Taipei Times correspondent
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS