During a speech to mark Double Ten National Day on Sunday, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a simple statement of fact: “The Republic of China [ROC] and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are mutually exclusive.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and others within the party, including former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), went berserk and accused Tsai of “violating the Constitution” and altering the so-called “status quo.” That the party elite are incensed over a choice of words that could easily have passed from Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) lips shows that the KMT has become completely divorced from its founding principles and urgently needs to adjust its malfunctioning political compass.
The party began to lose its way as early as when the Cultural Revolution drew to a close and former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), a victim of Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) purges, appeared to be jettisoning communism in favor of economic and political reform. By embracing capitalism, the CCP parked its tanks on the KMT’s lawn and robbed the party of its raison d’etre. The line between the “two Chinas” began to blur as the two economies converged.
Moreover, as China’s wealth grew, it began to delve back into its past and re-explore aspects of traditional Chinese culture that had only a few decades earlier been incinerated in a bonfire of wanton destruction. Another aspect of the KMT’s manifesto — preserving traditional Chinese culture — had been hollowed out.
However, it has become clear that the CCP never had any intention of enacting meaningful political reform and its economic reforms have also hit the buffers. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has slammed the country into reverse gear: tearing up the checks and balances on political power introduced by Deng, carrying out high-profile purges of self-made billionaires and raiding private firms’ balance sheets under the banner of “common prosperity.”
Since the CCP appears to be going full circle, and given that the KMT once modeled itself as an “anti-communist” outfit, this presents the KMT with a golden opportunity to return to its roots as a champion of capitalism and guardian of traditional Chinese culture.
The cultural aspect is not insignificant. A good example is the use of traditional Chinese characters. Hong Kong still uses them as well, but for how much longer will this continue now that the CCP has full control over the territory? It cannot be long until simplified characters are mandated by Beijing. As Singapore long ago adopted the simplified system, this would leave Taiwan as the last holdout of traditional Chinese characters, tasked with preserving the beauty, rich meaning and inner logic of the ancient writing system, crudely disemboweled by the CCP during the 1950s.
As the KMT appears to be devoid of ideas and a meaningful policy platform, here are a few suggestions for the new party chairman:
First, Chu should declare that unification is off the table, as China is not going to be democratizing any time soon, and unification would therefore contravene two of Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) Three Principles of the People: “democracy” and “the livelihood of the people.”
Second, Chu should amend the party’s constitution to bar members from holding meetings or liaising in any way with the CCP, either officially or in a personal capacity. Any member who breaches the rule should be stripped of their membership.
Finally, Chu should grant full access to the party’s archives so that the KMT can finally turn the page on its authoritarian past and fully embrace democracy.
The KMT’s only hope of survival is to reject unification with the PRC, rediscover its roots and re-enter the fight against the communists — as proud Taiwanese and custodians of traditional Chinese culture.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS