Last week, a team of Taiwanese freedivers who were competing in the Individual Depth Freediving World Championship in Cyprus had a nasty surprise when the organizers, the International Association for the Development of Apnea, without warning, removed the team’s national flag from a live feed of the event, leaving a blank space in its place. Later, the organizers issued a formal apology to Taiwan, saying that the stream had been cut off by Chinese authorities.
The “Chinese model” of combating the COVID-19 pandemic has involved using the authoritarian methods of a powerful state to impose and enforce lockdowns. China has been publicizing its pandemic-control achievements around the world, while engaging in dollar diplomacy and thereby demonstrating its “sharp power” on the international stage.
Meanwhile, in addition to making nonstop military threats against Taiwan, China has since February been repressing the nation’s agricultural sector, imposing bans without warning, while not replying to inquiries.
These actions are intended to cause misunderstandings and disagreements between Taiwanese officials and farmers, while also undermining farmers’ rights and morale. As well as having a transparent political purpose, these bans are a clear example of the cross-strait cognitive warfare that China has been working hard to develop, and how Beijing is employing it in practice.
Based on the US armed forces’ experience and observation of actual combat, Washington divides the process by which war develops into phases, namely “shape, deter, seize initiative, dominate, stabilize.”
Before engaging in actual warfare, armed forces must “shape” the conditions for operations in the theater of war by using political, economic, diplomatic and military means to create a favorable situation in advance.
Observing China’s recent actions from this point of view, Taiwanese must not ignore what Beijing is doing just because there is no actual fighting going on — they must cautiously face up to its serious implications.
Sun Tzu’s (孫子) The Art of War says that strategic planning and diplomacy are better methods for defeating an enemy than fighting bloody battles. After China suppressed Taiwan’s national flag at the freediving competition, 10 countries’ teams expressed their support for the nation by asking for their own national flags to also be removed from the livestream.
This gesture of solidarity illustrates how Taiwan’s sovereignty has over the past few years gained greater support and recognition around the world, so Taiwanese should not fall into China’s trap by belittling their country and conceding Taiwan’s national sovereignty.
Hou Hsin-tien is a student at National Defense University’s War College.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath