The tender for a planned Terminal 3 at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport was finally awarded on Aug. 30. Since the tender for constructing the 640,000m2 terminal opened in 2018 — a combined tender for civil, electrical and mechanical engineering — the project has gone through many failed tenders, budget increases, redesigns and deadline extensions, and the tender has even been split into two parts.
The civil engineering part was finally awarded on March 30, and the electrical and mechanical engineering parts last month. The new deadline for completing the terminal is June 2026 — five-and-a-half years behind the original deadline in December last year.
The main tender for this project — the design — was awarded in 2015 to a collaboration of British architectural firm Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners and CECI Engineering Consultants Inc Taiwan.
The design — which was the top choice of 11 attending tender committee members, including six foreign experts or academics — has a wave-shaped roof, roof gutters, glass skylights, large glass curtain walls and a streamlined ceiling with 130,000 petal-shaped aluminum tubes for sound absorption. People have praised the design, calling it stunning.
Who knew that a nightmare was soon to follow.
According to the bidding documents submitted by the two firms, the estimated cost of the terminal’s main building was NT$22.12 billion (US$797.5 million at the current exchange rate), which is within the budget announced in the airport operator’s tender notice.
The estimate’s items included engineering costs and scheduling, together accounting for 15 percent of the assessment points.
According to tender rules, if a project’s estimated costs exceed the budget, the bidder will lose points. Bidders usually use the announced budget as orientation for their cost estimate, and the selection committee usually does not spend much time on figuring out whether the estimate is realistic; as long as the estimate stays within the budget, the bidder is given a high rating.
Pragmatic design proposals with realistic cost estimates that would not exceed the budget are often not selected.
Unsurprisingly, when the airport operator issued the first engineering tender based on the two firms’ design, the project’s cost had already exceeded the budget by more than NT$39.5 billion.
This proves that the firms’ estimate was insufficient for realizing the fancy design and decorations. However, instead of abandoning the design, the airport operator increased the budget by more than NT$170 billion — something it seriously has to reflect on.
The operator should consider the example of the Tokyo Olympics’ main stadium. After the Japanese government awarded the design bid, it was discovered that the cost would exceed the budget by about ¥100 billion (US$909.1 million at the current exchange rate).
Then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe was immediately informed, the design was scrapped and the tender reopened, saving ¥100 billion.
However, despite the huge increase in the budget for Terminal 3, the engineering tender attracted no bids, as potential bidders said that the budget was still too low for carrying out the plan, estimated construction time was too short and they would need to bring in large numbers of migrant workers.
After replacing the chairman of the airport operator’s board twice — and with the help of the Cabinet, the Ministry of Transportation and Communication, the Ministry of Labor and the Public Construction Commission — the operator and the two firms were required to change to design to reduce costs, and the tender was split in two: civil engineering on the one hand, and electrical and mechanical engineering on the other.
In addition, the introduction of more than 2,000 foreign workers was allowed.
When the construction tenders were awarded this year, the budget had continued to increase sharply, to more than NT$57.2 billion — NT$44.5 billion for civil engineering and NT$12.7 billion for mechanical and electrical engineering. This is about NT$35.1 billion above the two firms’ original estimate.
The skyrocketing cost and the six-year delay are unacceptable.Who should be held responsible? The designers blame inflation and additional requests by the airport operator, while the operator says that the designers are responsible, as their estimate was unrealistic.
However, the design was selected by the operator, and as it did not have the courage to reverse its decision, how can it claim compensation and how should the compensation be calculated?
The case shows how a stunning design that dazzles the selection committee often blinds their consideration of whether the cost might exceed the budget — because the estimate is incomplete or underestimates the cost.
The consequences are failed tenders, budget increases, extended construction times and so on. Discarding an overly flashy design and pragmatically selecting a suitable one is the only way to avoid repeating this kind of mistake.
Su Ming-tong is a retired secretary-general of the Public Construction Commission.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs