Immediately after the tragic euthanization of 154 smuggled cats put a spotlight on animal welfare in the nation, another harrowing case took place with the brutal torture of Tea Tea (茶茶), a tabby cat in New Taipei City.
Tea Tea died from his injuries on Aug. 28, 11 days after someone surnamed Lee (黎) allegedly tortured him in cold blood for 13 hours in a bid to force his ex-girlfriend, who lived with him, to return home following an argument.
Even more alarming is that the two reportedly adopted the cat together and Lee helped raise him. The incident has sparked outrage, with Internet users vowing to track Lee down.
Similar to the calls for harsher penalties for animal smugglers following the euthanization, there is a strong consensus that the penalties for animal abuse are not harsh enough to deter offenders.
Lee was arrested two days after the incident, and faces a jail term of up to two years and a fine of NT$200,000 to NT$2 million (US$7,217 to US$72,168), according to the Animal Protection Act (動物保護法).
However, critics say that the penalties are not harsh enough, as jail sentences are almost always commuted to fines — even notorious cat killer Chan Ho-yeung’s (陳皓揚) sentence was commutable.
Lawyer Lu Chiu-yuan (呂秋遠), who often comments on social issues and is representing Lee’s ex-girlfriend in court, vowed in a Facebook post that he would try hard to make Lee the first person in the nation to go to jail for animal abuse — meaning that nobody has served time for such crimes.
Lu added that the maximum jail term should be increased to seven years and should not be commutable to a fine.
Furthermore, he called for bolstering animal welfare education in schools and the establishment of a specialized police force to handle cases of animal abuse. The police force issue has been around for years, but there is still no solution in sight, so the discussion has turned to amending the law. A petition on the National Development Council’s platform calling for heavier penalties has collected nearly 45,000 signatures, and the government has until Oct. 27 to respond.
This is an important issue, as people who torture helpless animals who trust humans have serious problems that cannot be solved with a fine. There is no reason that the penalty for such crimes should be so low, and if the government cannot move forward with an animal police force or cannot improve how such cases are dealt with, it should at least raise the penalties, as no one is arguing against such a move.
Encouraging and providing tools for victims of domestic abuse to protect themselves is also important. According to the ex-girlfriend’s statements, she has suffered for a long time under Lee’s alleged threats and violent behavior, and had been too afraid to tell people about it.
Society should not blame targets of abuse for not speaking out, as it is not as easy as one thinks, and this case is another example showing that tolerating abuse can lead to further tragedy. It is heartbreaking that the ex-girlfriend told the press: “Should I have just gone back to be beaten, so that Tea Tea wouldn’t have died?”
Lu has since helped her apply for a restraining order, and she is to press charges against Lee, who has also threatened her and her family.
However, as Lu said, none of this guarantees jail time for Lee, even if he is convicted on all counts.
The justice system cannot keep failing to protect those who cannot, or are too afraid, to speak out.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS