The TV drama series Seqalu: Formosa 1867, an adaptation of former doctor Chen Yao-chang’s 2016 novel Kui Lei Hua (傀儡花), has been building an audience since its premiere on Public Television Service. The book and the drama go against the traditional Taiwanese perspective on history, which has been shaped by the view of Han (漢) Taiwanese.
Taiwan is an immigrant society, whose earliest masters were the “gaoshan” (高山族), or highland Aborigines, and the “pingpu” (平埔族), or plains Aborigines. Taiwan’s historical perspective should be based on cultural diversity and ethnic integration.
At the end of Chen’s book, Tiap Moe (蝶妹) and Song Zai (松仔) marry and raise the next generation. Tiap Moe is of mixed highland Aborigine and Hakka descent, while Song Zai is half plains Aborigine and half southern Min (閩) Chinese. That means their children are a mixture of Taiwan’s four major communities, a situation that could well apply to a majority of Taiwanese today.
At that time, many Han men married highland or plains Aborigines. As the number of southern Min and Hakka immigrants and mixed marriages increased, Aboriginal communities quickly lost their land, and many, especially the plains Aborigines, were sinicized.
Just as with the highland and plains Aborigines on the Hengchun Peninsula (恆春半島) in southern Taiwan, the Pazeh community — plains Aborigines in the Taichung Basin — were affected by the Han people’s cultivation of their traditional lands in the mid-1800s.
Many of them never returned home after being drafted to suppress rebellions in China, and, as a result, they lost not only their land, but their numbers also dropped sharply, which accelerated the sinicization of the community.
The Pazeh community today resides by Liyu Lake (鯉魚潭) in Miaoli County’s Sanyih Township (三義). In the book Heroes in Taiwan’s Pioneering History: The Pazeh Tribe (台灣開拓史上的功臣：平埔巴宰族滄桑史), Aboriginal author Pan Ta-ho (潘大和), the grandson of the community’s last leader, said that although Qing Dynasty interpreter Zhang Dajing (張達京) — a Hakka from Guangdong Province who joined the community’s Anli group (岸里社) — contributed to the development of the Huludun Waterfront (葫蘆墩圳) and the Taichung Basin, credit should also be given to the Anli people.
This view differs from the Han view of history, which claims that Aborigines knew nothing about irrigation, and that it was the Han who built irrigation works in exchange for land.
Taiwan has been ruled by the Dutch, the Spanish, the Ming (明) and the Qing dynasties, and the Japanese. When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was defeated in the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the party and 2 million mainland people relocated to Taiwan.
Transformed by the growing number of mixed marriages in the past 30 years, Taiwan’s ethnic groups and culture have become increasingly diverse. However, the right to interpret history is controlled by those in power, not to mention that Taiwan’s Aborigines did not have a writing system in the past.
As a consequence, Taiwanese history has been dominated by the historical perspective of Han people, or even central China, ignoring Taiwan’s ethnic and cultural diversity. These are issues that we should consider as we read Kui Lei Hua and enjoy the TV show it spawned.
Ho Lai-mei is a writer of culture and history.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS