It is difficult to forget the harrowing photograph of Jih Chin-chun (日進春) that shows him laughing before his execution.
On Aug. 29, 1952, Jih was shot five times by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) military police by a river, his corpse left among a pile of bodies in today’s Liuzhangli (六張犁) area of Taipei.
Jih, a member of the Saisiyat community, was reportedly the first Aborigine to fall victim to the authoritarian regime’s White Terror atrocities, when anyone could “disappear” over suspicion that they were reading banned books, badmouthing the government, associating with communists or other activities.
The Transitional Justice Commission honored Jih on the 69th anniversary of his death, announcing that it has asked researchers to compile a booklet focusing on Aborigines killed during the period, including Paiwan youth Lai Hung-man (賴紅炎).
While Taiwanese today are familiar with Aboriginal resistance against Japanese rule thanks to movies such as Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale, little is mentioned about them when it comes to the White Terror era. How many people had heard of Jih and Lai until the commission highlighted them in a statement to the media on Sunday?
Only a handful of Aborigines are commonly mentioned and they were linked to the same incident: Yapasuyongu Yulunana and Uyonge Yatauyungana of the Tsou people, and Losing Watan, an Atayal. All three were politically active — the former two had already run afoul of the government by organizing an armed resistance against the government’s brutal crackdown following the 228 Incident, while Losing Watan was a member of the Provincial Assembly. All three were executed in 1954 for their involvement in advocating Aboriginal autonomy — two years after Jih — and branded as communists.
By contrast, Jih’s experiences echo those of countless others killed during the White Terror period. He was a schoolteacher who talked to the wrong people. Jih was reportedly recruited by Chinese Communist Party sympathizer Chang Yan-mei (張燕梅). Lai got into trouble over his writing while he was a student, in which he mused about how to improve the lives of Aborigines. He was detained, but eventually released.
It is a gargantuan task to unearth all of the stories, especially as some people are still reticent to talk, despite martial law having ended in 1987.
However, with the commission’s efforts, more of the truth will be revealed.
The stories of Aborigines during the White Terror era are an important part of history that is often overlooked, so it is good that the commission has allocated more effort to the issue.
As Legislator Saidhai Tahovecahe, a Rukai, wrote on Facebook, there were countless Aborigines besides Jih who suffered at the hands of the regime, including police officers, teachers, doctors and political leaders.
However, judging from some of the comments on Saidhai Tahovecahe’s post, some Taiwanese still see transitional justice as bringing up old wounds and dividing society.
However, as many Han Taiwanese still misunderstand Aborigines or even discriminate against them, it is important to understand that the great loss of land, culture and autonomy they experienced in the centuries prior continued during the White Terror period.
Misunderstandings arise because people forget the past, not because they bring it up, and as more about the period comes to light, hopefully it will bring more understanding and unity.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent