The withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan resulted in the Taliban romping to victory in a blitzkrieg-style campaign, knocking over the Afghan army like skittles. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wasted no time in milking the fall of Kabul for all it was worth.
Taiwan’s KMT-supporting pan-blue media immediately began to sow discord about the Taiwan-US relationship. No matter how many times the pan-blue camp professes to be pro-US, at critical junctures, it always reveals its true colors.
Taiwanese can draw an important lesson from this episode. The total collapse of the Afghanistan government was caused by two main factors: over-reliance on US protection and extreme internal corruption.
This has happened before. Endemic levels of corruption bedeviled both the KMT party-state regime and the US-sponsored South Vietnam government; they lacked fighting spirit and lost the support of their people. US support was the chief problem.
However, without US support, Taiwan would have long ago been invaded by China. There is no point trying to pretend otherwise; China’s power and military strength simply dwarf Taiwan’s.
Due to Taiwan’s issues with national identity, spies and traitors abound, some of whom occupy important positions.
While Taiwan’s location affords it geostrategic importance, Taiwanese must make the US believe that Taiwan is worth protecting. Taiwan must believe in itself and become an indispensable economic and military ally to the US.
On the economic front, Taiwan is already an indispensable electronics and technology supplier in the US’ industrial supply chain, a fact gratifyingly affirmed by Washington.
However, from a military perspective, questions remain.
First, high-ranking Taiwanese military officers have a habit of traveling to China and pledging loyalty to the CCP after retirement. This begs the question: During service, were their pledges of allegiance to the nation made in earnest?
Second, when these retired high-ranking officers make inappropriate statements designed to incite insurrection, why do serving officers not come forward in large numbers to denounce these individuals? Is it because of personal relationships, or is there another reason?
Responding to the shenanigans by pro-KMT media, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) hit the nail on the head, saying: “Afghanistan is today in a state of chaos because of internal chaos. Taiwan just needs to prevent internal disorder and it can resist any external force that might try to invade the nation.”
From Former KMT chairman Lien Chan’s (連戰) call to “unite with the CCP to control Taiwan” and former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promotion of the so-called “1992 consensus,” successive KMT politicians have sought to create internal chaos and let the wolf in through the back door.
Taiwan’s internal enemies are still running amok: Chinese spies are still being given overly lenient sentences, handed trivial fines or even found not guilty by Taiwanese courts. The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the hyping up of so-called “vaccine chaos” by Taiwan’s fifth column.
Without timely assistance from the US and Japan gifting Taiwan urgently needed supplies of COVID-19 vaccines, who knows what might have occurred? How many Taiwanese would have followed the siren call to accept Chinese vaccines?
If the KMT and the CCP were to incite a riot or a military insurrection, would Taiwanese flee like Afghans or would they stand their ground and fight for their country?
Hopefully Taiwanese would not wait for the government to take a stand or the US or Japan to come to their aid, and would not be afraid to sacrifice themselves by taking up a position on the front line to protect the nation, its wealth and future generations of Taiwanese.
Everyone has seen how cheaply the CCP values the lives of its citizens. Are Taiwanese really willing to become Chinese?
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS