The TV drama Seqalu: Formosa 1867 (斯卡羅), directed by Tsao Jui-yuan (曹瑞原) and adapted from Chen Yao-chang’s (陳耀昌) novel Kui Lei Hua (傀儡花), has created considerable interest in the history of the Aboriginal Puyuma and Paiwan peoples since it premiered on Public Television Service.
Increased interest in the history of Aborigines told from their own viewpoint is always a good thing, and there are too many tragic events in Aboriginal history that need to be addressed.
Take the Bunun people’s Bulbul community in Taitung County’s Haiduan Township (海端) for example: An ancient cannon in the community has witnessed many changes in the world and the sadness of the community.
Although dubbed the “ancient cannon of Bulbul,” the weapon did not originally belong to the community. Rather, it was deployed by Japanese colonial troops to intimidate the residents. The cannon was first deployed in Hualien County’s Batongguan (八通關) area during Japan’s campaign to control Taiwanese Aborigines.
At that time, the Japanese colonial government seized the weapons of Aborigines, who were deeply offended, as it made hunting very difficult. Disputes between colonial police and Aborigines eventually triggered a series of bloody conflicts.
The 1914 Bulbul Incident happened during the Bunun people’s anti-Japanese movement. Although the incident appears to have had a clear outcome, too many questions remain.
The most notorious incident between Japanese and Aborigines is perhaps the 1930 Wushe Incident in Nantou County, on which the 2011 epic film Seediq Bale, directed by Wei Te-sheng (魏德聖), is based. Although Japanese troops suppressed the local community with heavy weapons, they failed to subdue them.
In 1932, the Bunun people once again took up arms to resist the Japanese in the Daguanshan Incident in Taitung County, and the colonial government sent several big cannons to the area to deter the Bunun.
Those cannons have an impressive background: Originally used by the Russian Empire during the Russo-Japanese War, those then-state-of-the-art weapons were seized by Japan after Russia surrendered in 1905.
Eventually, one of the cannons was in 1945 left behind on the Batongguan Historic Trail (八通關古道) in the mountains of Taitung County, when Japan withdrew from Taiwan after its defeat in World War II.
The site is now a tourist spot with historical significance.
Tracing the background of the cannon is not difficult. However, what really happened during the Bulbul and Daguanshan incidents is not entirely clear.
In particular, the Bunun people say that Japanese troops used traps to initiate a “massacre” during the Bulbul Incident, while Japanese documents show that the troops were protecting the community from other Aboriginal peoples.
That there are two diametrically opposed interpretations of the incident makes one wonder if one side is trying to cover the historical truth. The ancient cannon of Bulbul is a reminder that we must not forget to strive for the historical truth.
Weber Lai is a professor in National Taiwan University of Arts’ radio and television department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals