Maybe this will be my Paul Krugman moment. The Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist was famously the winner of a study to establish which op-ed commentator was most consistently correct.
In 1998, he also famously claimed: “By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.”
I am not nearly so storied in accomplishments as Krugman, but I do make my living offering predictions and forecasts. So I might as well say it: I predict that the metaverse will not happen.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The “metaverse,” for those who do not know, is a still mostly hypothetical virtual world accessed by special virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technology. The idea is to create a sort of next-level Internet overlaid on our physical world.
People plugged into the metaverse exist in our physical world like everyone else, but can see and interact with things that others cannot.
Think The Matrix or the Star Trek Holodeck or the Fortnite-esque brandscapes of Ready Player One.
The concept of the metaverse is not new. The phrase was coined by Neal Stephenson in his 1992 science-fiction novel Snow Crash, which was set in a near future in which the virtual world and the physical world are inextricably interconnected.
Silicon Valley’s tech billionaires seem increasingly convinced that an actual metaverse is just over the horizon; the previously niche concept has been mentioned on earnings calls for Microsoft and Facebook.
‘MOBILE SUCCESSOR’
In a recent interview with The Verge, Facebook chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg enthusiastically described the metaverse as “the successor to the mobile Internet” and a kind of “embodied Internet, where instead of just viewing content, you are in it.”
At the same time as the metaverse discourse has been heating up, it has been a breakout year for the cryptocommunity.
The non-fungible token took the art world’s imagination by storm this winter.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk stoked — and then popped — a truly wild bitcoin bubble.
Now, neither Zuckerberg nor Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates tethered their concept of the metaverse to crypto, but I find it interesting that both the centralizers — tech giants whose power and influence rival nation states — and the decentralizers — cryptoinnovators who remain something of an influential subculture — see the new chapter in technological progress in roughly the same terms: to escape reality.
It is important to throw some cold water on this by remembering that the concept of virtual reality — which is really what the metaverse is — dates back a long time. Virtual reality was popularized by computer scientist and tech contrarian Jaron Lanier in the 1980s. His company, VPL Research, short for Virtual Programming Languages, achieved such success that toymaker Mattel licensed its “DataGlove” device — a kind of wired glove — to create a Nintendo game controller.
Yet, it has been more than three decades. Virtual and augmented reality of any kind has not exactly taken off.
Despite all the chatter about Oculus — the VR headset company that Facebook acquired, to much fanfare, in 2014 — few of even my most technophilic friends have hopped on the Oculus train.
I have only encountered the Oculus VR gear as a forlorn gadget in start-up headquarters — a novelty unceremoniously dumped next to the Wi-Fi router.
As tech analyst Benedict Evans recently wrote on Twitter: “My son is approximately 1000x more interested in Roblox” — an online game platform on which users can create their own games for other people to try — “than in getting my VR headset out of the cupboard. Different models of the future.”
VR was the techno-utopian future that Generation X was promised, but as Substack writer Paul Skallas recently noted: “Back in 1999/2000 people would tell you VR was right on the cusp of taking over. That it would change everything. It’s 2020. Where is it.”
VR — and AR after it — have run into a continual problem: People mostly like reality.
People have liked visual entertainment for as long as there have been screens, for as long as there have been theaters, but, like all entertainment, visual entertainment has its time and its place.
Remember Google Glass? I had a pair. It was abominable to use.
Who wants e-mail notifications obscuring their field of vision all day?
My phone is distraction enough. The synthesis of wearable tech and augmented reality pretty quickly parted ways.
AR became fun Snapchat filters that make you look like a Pixar character. Wearable tech became Apple watches to count your steps and alert you if you are having a heart attack.
CAPACITY, INCENTIVE
Two factors determine whether new technology catches on: capacity and incentive. Not all things that tech can do (capacity), people want (incentive).
Think back to the middle of the 2000s, or rewatch David Fincher’s 2010 classic The Social Network. The building blocks of social networking existed long before Zuckerberg created Facebook.
In fact, several social networks already existed.
Remember Friendster and MySpace? The capacity was there, but what was the incentive?
To get people to join his network in droves, Zuckerberg added two ingredients that the earlier social networks lacked: exclusivity and status.
When Facebook first launched, only those who attended a small group of prestigious colleges could join.
I graduated high school in 2005, and I am ashamed to say that Facebook influenced my school choice. Facebook in the early days was additive. It was where you found friends before you arrived on campus, solidified nascent relationships, shared boozy and embarrassing memories.
My question for metaverse boosters is this: What does the metaverse add to everyday life?
I have used Oculus goggles before. I found they had a weird time distortion effect. When I took them off, I felt vaguely tired. Coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has reminded everyone that a Zoom call is very much not the same thing as hugging your mom, I am skeptical that Zoom-fatigued workers will be interested in leveling up to working in the metaverse — whatever that might mean.
A new youth survey by Dazed reports that just 9 percent of Gen Zers want to stay on social media; fatigue with digital substitutes for real life might be even broader than just the Zoom-fatigued legions working from home.
Tech oligarchs like Zuckerberg, with his Sauron-like ambition to own the One Ring to rule them all, seem like the worst choice to put in charge of building a new world.
I am more sympathetic to the cryptocommunity’s nascent interest in the metaverse. The promise of crypto, it seems to me, is its potential to spark decentralization in an already overly centralized world.
The metaverse proposes a smoothed-out and rationalized version of our messy and chaotic world.
The question that crypto seems to face most pressingly is: Why should crypto matter to everyone?
If crypto is to be truly revolutionary, then it will have to give an answer that formats digital life down to a human scale, not up to a megalomaniac’s.
Sean Monahan is a writer and trend forecaster based in Los Angeles. He cofounded K-Hole, a trend forecasting group best known for coining the term “normcore.”
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS