Several weeks ago, an opinion article appeared in a certain pro-China newspaper in Taiwan that warned of the danger posed to Hong Kong’s financial sector by several of Beijing’s policies.
This kind of criticism, which would in the past have been branded as “talking down” China, is now being advanced as well-meaning advice by pro-Beijing Taiwanese media. This suggests a degree of anxiety. At its heart, it is probably a reaction to the many dangers that have appeared following a succession of policies from Beijing over the past year that run contrary to the “dual circulation” economic development strategy unveiled by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Last year, Beijing was facing a double whammy from a COVID-19 outbreak and a trade war with the US. To turn around China’s declining fortunes, Xi proposed a new “domestic and international dual circulation” development strategy, which would involve expanding internal demand while creating space for external expansion.
However, Beijing has adopted Middle Kingdom thinking that has closed off China to the outside world and weakened the international element of Xi’s strategy.
At the same time, the harsh and crude tactics employed by Xi to deal with internal political problems have broadly affected the domestic element of the strategy and increased risk in China’s financial system, which has spread to stock markets in Hong Kong and New York.
The abrupt policy shift toward China’s tech monopolies has either forced them to drastically scale back their business operations or swallow enormous fines. As a result, e-commerce giant Alibaba Group’s share price has sunk 35 percent so far this year, vaporizing almost US$300 billion from the company’s total market capitalization. Alibaba’s competitors were not spared either; Tencent Holdings’ share price has dropped 33 percent, while Baidu and JD.com have seen their share prices drop by 30 percent.
Also unforeseen was Beijing last month intervening to “alleviate Chinese students’ schoolwork burden.” This resulted in share-price collapses of Chinese private tuition companies registered in New York and Hong Kong, including brands such as New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Gaotu Techedu, 17zuoye and TAL Education Group. More than 90 percent has been wiped off the value of China’s private education sector.
Prior to Beijing’s announcement, New Oriental’s market value was the highest in the industry, reaching HK$270 billion (US$34.7 billion). Following an epic run on its stock price, the company’s value was reduced to HK$30 billion. The shock this delivered to the financial system might not have yet fully played out.
In terms of China’s international strategy, ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing came under enormous pressure from Chinese regulators after it listed on the New York Stock Exchange. This has produced a chilling effect, causing Chinese companies with plans to list overseas to quickly retreat.
The crackdown by Beijing will not just affect the development of individual companies; a more alarming effect will be that foreign investors could lose confidence in the Chinese market.
Foreign investors not only provide seed capital for Chinese start-ups, but also bring in modern management techniques, international outlooks to business operations and a bridge to global markets — all vital for Chinese enterprises to grow into first-tier international businesses.
If foreign investors decline to provide support, growing Chinese companies could find it difficult to gain access to international capital and technology.
Honda Chen is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Edward Jones
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a